All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
senate vote 2008-08-27#3

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:19:56

Title

Description

  • The [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 motion] failed to get a majority and so was rejected. This is because an equal number of senators voted 'aye' and 'no'. It was introduced by Family First Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Steve_Fielding&mpc=Senate&house=senate Steve Fielding].
  • The motion was: "''That the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r3031 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008] be referred to the Environment, Communications and the Arts Committee for inquiry and report by 10 November 2008.''"
  • Senator Fielding explained that the reason for his motion was the "concern about the changes in the definitions and direction of the management of the park and about the definition of the precautionary principle, which basically could end up stopping any recreational fishing in the marine park".(Read his full explanation [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 here].)
  • References
  • The [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2) failed to get a majority and so was rejected. This is because an equal number of senators voted 'aye' and 'no'. It was introduced by Family First Senator [Steve Fielding](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Steve_Fielding&mpc=Senate&house=senate).
  • The motion was: "_That the [Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r3031) be referred to the Environment, Communications and the Arts Committee for inquiry and report by 10 November 2008._"
  • Senator Fielding explained that the reason for his motion was the "concern about the changes in the definitions and direction of the management of the park and about the definition of the precautionary principle, which basically could end up stopping any recreational fishing in the marine park".(Read his full explanation [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2).)
  • References
senate vote 2008-08-27#3

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:16:35

Title

Description

  • The [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 motion] failed to get a majority and so was rejected. This is because an equal number of senators voted 'aye' and 'no'. It was introduced by Family First Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Steve_Fielding&mpc=Senate&house=senate Steve Fielding].
  • The motion was: "''That the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r3031 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008] be referred to the Environment, Communications and the Arts Committee for inquiry and report by 10 November 2008.''"
  • Senator Fielding explained that the reason for his motion was the "concern about the changes in the definitions and direction of the management of the park and about the definition of the precautionary principle, which basically could end up stopping any recreational fishing in the marine park".[1]
  • Senator Fielding explained that the reason for his motion was the "concern about the changes in the definitions and direction of the management of the park and about the definition of the precautionary principle, which basically could end up stopping any recreational fishing in the marine park".(Read his full explanation [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 here].)
  • References
  • * [1] Read his full explanation [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 here].
senate vote 2008-08-27#3

Edited by mackay

on 2014-04-11 15:25:59

Title

Description

  • The [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 motion] failed to get a majority and so was rejected. This is because an equal number of senators voted 'aye' and 'no'. It was introduced by Family First Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Steve_Fielding&mpc=Senate&house=senate Steve Fielding].
  • The motion was:
  • "''That the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r3031 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008] be referred to the Environment, Communications and the Arts Committee for inquiry and report by 10 November 2008.''"
  • The motion was: "''That the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r3031 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008] be referred to the Environment, Communications and the Arts Committee for inquiry and report by 10 November 2008.''"
  • Senator Fielding explained that the reason for his motion was the "concern about the changes in the definitions and direction of the management of the park and about the definition of the precautionary principle, which basically could end up stopping any recreational fishing in the marine park".[1]
  • References
  • * [1] Read his full explanation [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 here].
  • * [1] Read his full explanation [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 here].
senate vote 2008-08-27#3

Edited by mackay

on 2014-04-11 15:25:40

Title

  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008 Referral to Committee
  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008 - Referral to Committee

Description

  • <p pwmotiontext="moved">That the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008 be referred to the Environment, Communications and the Arts Committee for inquiry and report by 10 November 2008.</p>
  • <p pwmotiontext="moved">That the motion (<b>Senator Fielding&#8217;s</b>) be agreed to.</p>
  • The [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 motion] failed to get a majority and so was rejected. This is because an equal number of senators voted 'aye' and 'no'. It was introduced by Family First Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Steve_Fielding&mpc=Senate&house=senate Steve Fielding].
  • The motion was:
  • "''That the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r3031 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008] be referred to the Environment, Communications and the Arts Committee for inquiry and report by 10 November 2008.''"
  • Senator Fielding explained that the reason for his motion was the "concern about the changes in the definitions and direction of the management of the park and about the definition of the precautionary principle, which basically could end up stopping any recreational fishing in the marine park".[1]
  • References
  • * [1] Read his full explanation [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-08-27.91.2 here].