Division Description Changes — Native Title Amendment Bill 2006 — Third Reading — 26th Mar 2007

All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change	Division
senate vote 2007-03-26#6 Edited by system on 2014-10-07 16:19:45	Title Description The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. ) This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended. Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law. ~~''Background to the bill''~~ When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives Attorney-General] said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.(Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest]. ) The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676 bill] amends the ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993 Native Title Act 1993]'' to: * introduce a new regime for representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander] bodies; * implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,(More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].) particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and * implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program. ~~References~~ The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1) to read the bill for a third time.(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [here](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). ) This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended. Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law. _Background to the bill_ When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [Attorney-General](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives) said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.(Read more about native title in Australia [here](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia). Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077). ) The [bill](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676) amends the _ [Native Title Act 1993](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993)_ to: - introduce a new regime for representative [Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians) bodies; - implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,(More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index).) particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [National Native Title Tribunal](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal) (NNTT); and - implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program. References
senate vote 2007-03-26#6 Edited by system on 2014-10-07 16:16:33	Title Description The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.[1] This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended. The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. ) This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended. Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law. ''Background to the bill'' When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives Attorney-General] said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.[2] When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives Attorney-General] said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.(Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest]. ) The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676 bill] amends the ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993 Native Title Act 1993]'' to: * introduce a new regime for representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander] bodies; * implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,[3] particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and * implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,(More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].) particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and * implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program. References * [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. * [2] Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest]. * [3] More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].
senate vote 2007-03-26#6 Edited by mackay staff on 2014-05-16 11:20:22	Title Description The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.[1] This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended. Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law. ''Background to the bill'' When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the Federal Attorney-General said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.[2] When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives Attorney-General] said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.[2] The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676 bill] amends the ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993 Native Title Act 1993]'' to: * introduce a new regime for representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander] bodies; * implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,[3] particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and * implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program. References * [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. * [2] Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest]. * [3] More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here]. * [3] More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].
senate vote 2007-03-26#6 Edited by mackay staff on 2014-05-16 11:16:46	Title ~~Native Title Amendment Bill 2006 — Third Reading~~ Native Title Amendment Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time Description ~~<p pwmotiontext="moved">That this bill be now read a third time.</p>~~ The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.[1] This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended. Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law. ''Background to the bill'' When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the Federal Attorney-General said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.[2] The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676 bill] amends the ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993 Native Title Act 1993]'' to: * introduce a new regime for representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander] bodies; * implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,[3] particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and * implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program. References * [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. * [2] Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest]. * [3] More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].

Change

Division

senate vote 2007-03-26#6

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:19:45

Title

Description

The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. ) This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended.
Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law.
~~''Background to the bill''~~
When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives Attorney-General] said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.(Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest]. )
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676 bill] amends the ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993 Native Title Act 1993]'' to:
* introduce a new regime for representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander] bodies;
* implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,(More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].) particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and
* implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program.
~~References~~
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1) to read the bill for a third time.(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [here](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). ) This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended.
Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law.
_Background to the bill_
When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [Attorney-General](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives) said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.(Read more about native title in Australia [here](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia). Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077). )
The [bill](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676) amends the _ [Native Title Act 1993](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993)_ to:
- introduce a new regime for representative [Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians) bodies;
- implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,(More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index).) particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [National Native Title Tribunal](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal) (NNTT); and
- implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program.
References

senate vote 2007-03-26#6

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:16:33

Title

Description

The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.[1] This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended.
The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. ) This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended.
Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law.
''Background to the bill''
When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives Attorney-General] said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.[2]
When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives Attorney-General] said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.(Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest]. )
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676 bill] amends the ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993 Native Title Act 1993]'' to:
* introduce a new regime for representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander] bodies;
* implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,[3] particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and
* implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,(More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].) particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and
* implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program.
References
* [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].
* [2] Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest].
* [3] More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].

senate vote 2007-03-26#6

Edited by mackay staff

on 2014-05-16 11:20:22

Title

Description

The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.[1] This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended.
Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law.
''Background to the bill''
When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the Federal Attorney-General said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.[2]
When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Philip_Ruddock&mpc=Berowra&house=representatives Attorney-General] said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.[2]
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676 bill] amends the ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993 Native Title Act 1993]'' to:
* introduce a new regime for representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander] bodies;
* implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,[3] particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and
* implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program.
References
* [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].
* [2] Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest].
* [3] More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].
* [3] More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].

senate vote 2007-03-26#6

Edited by mackay staff

on 2014-05-16 11:16:46

Title

~~Native Title Amendment Bill 2006 — Third Reading~~
Native Title Amendment Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time

Description

~~<p pwmotiontext="moved">That this bill be now read a third time.</p>~~
The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-26.102.1 motion] to read the bill for a third time.[1] This means that the majority of senators agree with the bill, as amended.
Although the House of Representatives had already agreed to read the bill for a third time and this would ordinarily mean that the bill could now become law, in this case the bill must return to the House for them to consider the amendments agreed to in the Senate. If the House agrees with the Senate's amendments, the bill can then become law.
''Background to the bill''
When announcing his intention to amend the mechanics of the Native Title process, the Federal Attorney-General said that the amendments would not affect the substance of the Native Title legislation.[2]
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2676 bill] amends the ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Title_Act_1993 Native Title Act 1993]'' to:
* introduce a new regime for representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander] bodies;
* implement recommendations made by an independent review into the native title claims resolution process,[3] particularly in relation to increased powers and functions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Native_Title_Tribunal National Native Title Tribunal] (NNTT); and
* implement changes to the prescribed bodies corporate governance regime and the native title non-claimants financial assistance program.
References
* [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].
* [2] Read more about native title in Australia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_title_in_Australia here]. Read more about the background to this bill, including the Attorney General's policy commitment, in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd077 bills digest].
* [3] More information about the inquiry, including its final report, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/native_title/index here].