All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
senate vote 2006-11-07#8

Edited by Henare Degan

on 2014-10-10 15:35:24

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of an [amendment](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-11-07.129.1) introduced by Australian Democrat Senator [Natasha Stott Despoja](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate) also on behalf of Labor Senator [Ruth Webber](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ruth_Webber&mpc=Senate&house=senate).
  • Senator Stott Despoja explained that the amendment reduces the duration of a warrant from a month to 15 days so as to prevent any excess warrant power.(Read Senator Stott Despoja's whole explanation and the related debate [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-11-07.78.2), starting after 7.47 pm. )
  • Due to the sensitive subject matter of this bill, the parties have agreed to allow it to be a free vote.(Read more about what a free vote is in our [FAQ Section](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree). More information about the decision to have a free vote on this bill is available on ABC News [here](http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1716062.htm). )
  • _Background to the bill_
  • The bill was introduced to amend the _Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002_ and _Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002_. The amendments will permit certain [human embryo research](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell) under licence but retain existing prohibitions on [human reproductive cloning](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cloning) and other assisted reproductive technology activities.(Read information about the bill, including its explanatory memorandum and bills digest, [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s533). ) For example, it proposes to allow for [therapeutic cloning](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic-cell_nuclear_transfer).(Read more about therapeutic cloning [here](http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1778636.htm). )
  • The amendments are based on recommendations by the [Lockhart Review](http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/63190/20060912-0000/www.lockhartreview.com.au/index.html).(Read more about the Lockhart Review and the federal government’s response in the [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd059).)
  • This division relates to the Policy _[For stem cell research](/policies/22)_.
  • The majority voted in favour of an [amendment](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-11-07.129.1) introduced by Australian Democrat Senator [Natasha Stott Despoja](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate) also on behalf of Labor Senator [Ruth Webber](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ruth_Webber&mpc=Senate&house=senate).
  • Senator Stott Despoja explained that the amendment reduces the duration of a warrant from a month to 15 days so as to prevent any excess warrant power.(Read Senator Stott Despoja's whole explanation and the related debate [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-11-07.78.2), starting after 7.47 pm. )
  • Due to the sensitive subject matter of this bill, the parties have agreed to allow it to be a free vote.(Read more about what a free vote is in our [FAQ Section](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree). More information about the decision to have a free vote on this bill is available on ABC News [here](http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1716062.htm). )
  • _Background to the bill_
  • The bill was introduced to amend the _Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002_ and _Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002_. The amendments will permit certain [human embryo research](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell) under licence but retain existing prohibitions on [human reproductive cloning](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cloning) and other assisted reproductive technology activities.(Read information about the bill, including its explanatory memorandum and bills digest, [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s533). ) For example, it proposes to allow for [therapeutic cloning](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic-cell_nuclear_transfer).(Read more about therapeutic cloning [here](http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1778636.htm). )
  • The amendments are based on recommendations by the [Lockhart Review](http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/63190/20060912-0000/www.lockhartreview.com.au/index.html).(Read more about the Lockhart Review and the federal government’s response in the [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd059).)
  • References
senate vote 2006-11-07#8

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:19:41

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of an [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-11-07.129.1 amendment] introduced by Australian Democrat Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja] also on behalf of Labor Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ruth_Webber&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ruth Webber].
  • Senator Stott Despoja explained that the amendment reduces the duration of a warrant from a month to 15 days so as to prevent any excess warrant power.(Read Senator Stott Despoja's whole explanation and the related debate [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-11-07.78.2 here], starting after 7.47 pm. )
  • Due to the sensitive subject matter of this bill, the parties have agreed to allow it to be a free vote.(Read more about what a free vote is in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section]. More information about the decision to have a free vote on this bill is available on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1716062.htm here]. )
  • ''Background to the bill''
  • The bill was introduced to amend the ''Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002'' and ''Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002''. The amendments will permit certain [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell human embryo research] under licence but retain existing prohibitions on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cloning human reproductive cloning] and other assisted reproductive technology activities.(Read information about the bill, including its explanatory memorandum and bills digest, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s533 here]. ) For example, it proposes to allow for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic-cell_nuclear_transfer therapeutic cloning].(Read more about therapeutic cloning [http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1778636.htm here]. )
  • The amendments are based on recommendations by the [http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/63190/20060912-0000/www.lockhartreview.com.au/index.html Lockhart Review].(Read more about the Lockhart Review and the federal government’s response in the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd059 bills digest].)
  • References
  • The majority voted in favour of an [amendment](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-11-07.129.1) introduced by Australian Democrat Senator [Natasha Stott Despoja](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate) also on behalf of Labor Senator [Ruth Webber](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ruth_Webber&mpc=Senate&house=senate).
  • Senator Stott Despoja explained that the amendment reduces the duration of a warrant from a month to 15 days so as to prevent any excess warrant power.(Read Senator Stott Despoja's whole explanation and the related debate [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-11-07.78.2), starting after 7.47 pm. )
  • Due to the sensitive subject matter of this bill, the parties have agreed to allow it to be a free vote.(Read more about what a free vote is in our [FAQ Section](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree). More information about the decision to have a free vote on this bill is available on ABC News [here](http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1716062.htm). )
  • _Background to the bill_
  • The bill was introduced to amend the _Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002_ and _Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002_. The amendments will permit certain [human embryo research](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell) under licence but retain existing prohibitions on [human reproductive cloning](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cloning) and other assisted reproductive technology activities.(Read information about the bill, including its explanatory memorandum and bills digest, [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s533). ) For example, it proposes to allow for [therapeutic cloning](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic-cell_nuclear_transfer).(Read more about therapeutic cloning [here](http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1778636.htm). )
  • The amendments are based on recommendations by the [Lockhart Review](http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/63190/20060912-0000/www.lockhartreview.com.au/index.html).(Read more about the Lockhart Review and the federal government’s response in the [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd059).)
  • References
senate vote 2006-11-07#8

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:16:31

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of an [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-11-07.129.1 amendment] introduced by Australian Democrat Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja] also on behalf of Labor Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ruth_Webber&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ruth Webber].
  • Senator Stott Despoja explained that the amendment reduces the duration of a warrant from a month to 15 days so as to prevent any excess warrant power.[1]
  • Senator Stott Despoja explained that the amendment reduces the duration of a warrant from a month to 15 days so as to prevent any excess warrant power.(Read Senator Stott Despoja's whole explanation and the related debate [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-11-07.78.2 here], starting after 7.47 pm. )
  • Due to the sensitive subject matter of this bill, the parties have agreed to allow it to be a free vote.[2]
  • Due to the sensitive subject matter of this bill, the parties have agreed to allow it to be a free vote.(Read more about what a free vote is in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section]. More information about the decision to have a free vote on this bill is available on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1716062.htm here]. )
  • ''Background to the bill''
  • The bill was introduced to amend the ''Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002'' and ''Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002''. The amendments will permit certain [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell human embryo research] under licence but retain existing prohibitions on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cloning human reproductive cloning] and other assisted reproductive technology activities.[3] For example, it proposes to allow for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic-cell_nuclear_transfer therapeutic cloning].[4]
  • The bill was introduced to amend the ''Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002'' and ''Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002''. The amendments will permit certain [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell human embryo research] under licence but retain existing prohibitions on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cloning human reproductive cloning] and other assisted reproductive technology activities.(Read information about the bill, including its explanatory memorandum and bills digest, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s533 here]. ) For example, it proposes to allow for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic-cell_nuclear_transfer therapeutic cloning].(Read more about therapeutic cloning [http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1778636.htm here]. )
  • The amendments are based on recommendations by the [http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/63190/20060912-0000/www.lockhartreview.com.au/index.html Lockhart Review].[5]
  • The amendments are based on recommendations by the [http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/63190/20060912-0000/www.lockhartreview.com.au/index.html Lockhart Review].(Read more about the Lockhart Review and the federal government’s response in the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd059 bills digest].)
  • References
  • * [1] Read Senator Stott Despoja's whole explanation and the related debate [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-11-07.78.2 here], starting after 7.47 pm.
  • * [2] Read more about what a free vote is in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section]. More information about the decision to have a free vote on this bill is available on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1716062.htm here].
  • * [3] Read information about the bill, including its explanatory memorandum and bills digest, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s533 here].
  • * [4] Read more about therapeutic cloning [http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1778636.htm here].
  • * [5] Read more about the Lockhart Review and the federal government’s response in the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd059 bills digest].
senate vote 2006-11-07#8

Edited by mackay

on 2014-05-12 09:07:28

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of an [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-11-07.129.1 amendment] introduced by Australian Democrat Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja] also on behalf of Labor Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ruth_Webber&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ruth Webber].
  • Senator Stott Despoja explained that the amendment reduces the duration of the warrant from a month to 15 days so as to prevent any excess warrant power.[1]
  • Senator Stott Despoja explained that the amendment reduces the duration of a warrant from a month to 15 days so as to prevent any excess warrant power.[1]
  • Due to the sensitive subject matter of this bill, the parties have agreed to allow it to be a free vote.[2]
  • ''Background to the bill''
  • The bill was introduced to amend the ''Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002'' and ''Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002''. The amendments will permit certain [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell human embryo research] under licence but retain existing prohibitions on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cloning human reproductive cloning] and other assisted reproductive technology activities.[3] For example, it proposes to allow for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic-cell_nuclear_transfer therapeutic cloning].[4]
  • The amendments are based on recommendations by the [http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/63190/20060912-0000/www.lockhartreview.com.au/index.html Lockhart Review].[5]
  • References
  • * [1] Read Senator Stott Despoja's whole explanation and the related debate [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-11-07.78.2 here], starting after 7.47 pm.
  • * [2] Read more about what a free vote is in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section]. More information about the decision to have a free vote on this bill is available on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1716062.htm here].
  • * [3] Read information about the bill, including its explanatory memorandum and bills digest, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s533 here].
  • * [4] Read more about therapeutic cloning [http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1778636.htm here].
  • * [5] Read more about the Lockhart Review and the federal government’s response in the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd059 bills digest].
senate vote 2006-11-07#8

Edited by mackay

on 2014-05-12 09:06:35

Title

  • Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 In Committee
  • Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - In Committee - 15 day warrant duration

Description

  • <p class="motion-notice motion-notice-notext">No motion text available</p>
  • The majority voted in favour of an [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-11-07.129.1 amendment] introduced by Australian Democrat Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja] also on behalf of Labor Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ruth_Webber&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ruth Webber].
  • Senator Stott Despoja explained that the amendment reduces the duration of the warrant from a month to 15 days so as to prevent any excess warrant power.[1]
  • Due to the sensitive subject matter of this bill, the parties have agreed to allow it to be a free vote.[2]
  • ''Background to the bill''
  • The bill was introduced to amend the ''Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002'' and ''Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002''. The amendments will permit certain [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell human embryo research] under licence but retain existing prohibitions on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cloning human reproductive cloning] and other assisted reproductive technology activities.[3] For example, it proposes to allow for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic-cell_nuclear_transfer therapeutic cloning].[4]
  • The amendments are based on recommendations by the [http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/63190/20060912-0000/www.lockhartreview.com.au/index.html Lockhart Review].[5]
  • References
  • * [1] Read Senator Stott Despoja's whole explanation and the related debate [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-11-07.78.2 here], starting after 7.47 pm.
  • * [2] Read more about what a free vote is in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section]. More information about the decision to have a free vote on this bill is available on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1716062.htm here].
  • * [3] Read information about the bill, including its explanatory memorandum and bills digest, [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s533 here].
  • * [4] Read more about therapeutic cloning [http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1778636.htm here].
  • * [5] Read more about the Lockhart Review and the federal government’s response in the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd0607/07bd059 bills digest].