Division Description Changes — Uranium Exports — 28th Mar 2006

All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change	Division
senate vote 2006-03-28#3 Edited by system on 2014-10-07 16:21:08	Title Description The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-03-28.61.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate Christine Milne], which means that it was rejected. The motion was: ~~''That the Senate—''~~ ~~''(a) notes that:''~~ ''(i) Prime Minister [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Howard&mpc=Bennelong&house=representatives John Howard] has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty], and'' ''(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security Institute of Science and International Security]; and''(You can see the report [http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf here] (198 KB).) ''(b) calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Suppliers_Group Nuclear Suppliers Group] to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement.'' ~~References~~ The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-03-28.61.2) introduced by Greens Senator [Christine Milne](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was rejected. The motion was: _That the Senate—_ _(a) notes that:_ _(i) Prime Minister [John Howard](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Howard&mpc=Bennelong&house=representatives) has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty), and_ _(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [Institute of Science and International Security](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security); and_(You can see the report [here](http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf) (198 KB).) _(b) calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the [Nuclear Suppliers Group](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Suppliers_Group) to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement._ References
senate vote 2006-03-28#3 Edited by system on 2014-10-07 16:16:53	Title Description The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-03-28.61.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate Christine Milne], which means that it was rejected. The motion was: ''That the Senate—'' ''(a) notes that:'' ''(i) Prime Minister [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Howard&mpc=Bennelong&house=representatives John Howard] has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty], and'' ''(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security Institute of Science and International Security]; and''[1] ''(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security Institute of Science and International Security]; and''(You can see the report [http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf here] (198 KB).) ''(b) calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Suppliers_Group Nuclear Suppliers Group] to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement.'' References * [1] You can see the report [http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf here] (198 KB).
senate vote 2006-03-28#3 Edited by mackay staff on 2014-08-08 12:13:34	Title ~~Uranium Exports~~ Motions - Uranium Exports - No export to India Description ~~<p class="speaker">Christine Milne</p>~~ ~~<p>I move:</p>~~ <dl><dt></dt><dd>That the Senate&#8212;<dl><dt>(a)</dt><dd>notes that:<dl><dt>(i)</dt><dd>Prime Minister John Howard has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and</dd><dt>(ii)</dt><dd>India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based Institute of Science and International Security; and</dd></dl></dd><dt>(b)</dt><dd>calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the Nuclear Suppliers Group to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement.</dd></dl></dd></dl><p>Question put:</p> The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-03-28.61.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate Christine Milne], which means that it was rejected. The motion was: ''That the Senate—'' ''(a) notes that:'' ''(i) Prime Minister [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Howard&mpc=Bennelong&house=representatives John Howard] has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty], and'' ''(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security Institute of Science and International Security]; and''[1] ''(b) calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Suppliers_Group Nuclear Suppliers Group] to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement.'' References * [1] You can see the report [http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf here] (198 KB).

Change

Division

senate vote 2006-03-28#3

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:21:08

Title

Description

The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-03-28.61.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate Christine Milne], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
~~''That the Senate—''~~
~~''(a) notes that:''~~
''(i) Prime Minister [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Howard&mpc=Bennelong&house=representatives John Howard] has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty], and''
''(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security Institute of Science and International Security]; and''(You can see the report [http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf here] (198 KB).)
''(b) calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Suppliers_Group Nuclear Suppliers Group] to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement.''
~~References~~
The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-03-28.61.2) introduced by Greens Senator [Christine Milne](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
_That the Senate—_
_(a) notes that:_
_(i) Prime Minister [John Howard](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Howard&mpc=Bennelong&house=representatives) has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty), and_
_(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [Institute of Science and International Security](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security); and_(You can see the report [here](http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf) (198 KB).)
_(b) calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the [Nuclear Suppliers Group](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Suppliers_Group) to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement._
References

senate vote 2006-03-28#3

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:16:53

Title

Description

The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-03-28.61.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate Christine Milne], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
''That the Senate—''
''(a) notes that:''
''(i) Prime Minister [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Howard&mpc=Bennelong&house=representatives John Howard] has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty], and''
''(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security Institute of Science and International Security]; and''[1]
''(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security Institute of Science and International Security]; and''(You can see the report [http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf here] (198 KB).)
''(b) calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Suppliers_Group Nuclear Suppliers Group] to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement.''
References
* [1] You can see the report [http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf here] (198 KB).

senate vote 2006-03-28#3

Edited by mackay staff

on 2014-08-08 12:13:34

Title

~~Uranium Exports~~
Motions - Uranium Exports - No export to India

Description

~~Christine Milne~~
~~I move:~~
<dl><dt></dt><dd>That the Senate&#8212;<dl><dt>(a)</dt><dd>notes that:<dl><dt>(i)</dt><dd>Prime Minister John Howard has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and</dd><dt>(ii)</dt><dd>India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based Institute of Science and International Security; and</dd></dl></dd><dt>(b)</dt><dd>calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the Nuclear Suppliers Group to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement.</dd></dl></dd></dl>Question put:
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-03-28.61.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate Christine Milne], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
''That the Senate—''
''(a) notes that:''
''(i) Prime Minister [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Howard&mpc=Bennelong&house=representatives John Howard] has recently equivocated on the export of uranium to India, in spite of the fact that India is not a signatory to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty], and''
''(ii) India has a well-developed, active and secret program to outfit its uranium enrichment program and circumvent other countries’ technology export control efforts, according to a recently-released report by the United States of America (US) based [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Science_and_International_Security Institute of Science and International Security]; and''[1]
''(b) calls on the Australian Government to rule out the export of uranium to India and to use its membership of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Suppliers_Group Nuclear Suppliers Group] to block the proposed US-India nuclear technology agreement.''
References
* [1] You can see the report [http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/indianprocurement.pdf here] (198 KB).