All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
representatives vote 2025-02-10#5

Edited by mackay staff

on 2025-02-14 14:17:57

Title

Description

  • The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/28685/&sid=0000) introduced by Petrie MP [Luke Howarth](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/petrie/luke_howarth) (Liberal), which means it failed. The amendment would have removed Schedule 2 from the bill.
  • The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/28685/&sid=0000) introduced by Petrie MP [Luke Howarth](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/petrie/luke_howarth) (Liberal), which means it failed. The amendment would have removed [Schedule 2](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=LEGISLATION;id=legislation%2Fbills%2Fr7299_first-reps%2F0002;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr7299_first-reps%2F0000%22;rec=0) from the bill.
  • ### Amendment text
  • > *(1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 2), omit "Schedules 1 and 2", substitute "Schedule 1".*
  • >
  • > *(3) Schedule 2, page 5 (lines 1 to 15), omit the Schedule.*
  • > *(3) Schedule 2, page 5 (lines 1 to 15), omit the Schedule.*
representatives vote 2025-02-10#5

Edited by mackay staff

on 2025-02-14 14:17:29

Title

  • Bills — Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Bill 2024; Consideration in Detail
  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Denying deductions for interest charges

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Milton Dick</p>
  • <p>The question now is that government amendments (1) and (2) on sheet UG105 be agreed to.</p>
  • The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/28685/&sid=0000) introduced by Petrie MP [Luke Howarth](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/petrie/luke_howarth) (Liberal), which means it failed. The amendment would have removed Schedule 2 from the bill.
  • ### Amendment text
  • > *(1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 2), omit "Schedules 1 and 2", substitute "Schedule 1".*
  • >
  • > *(3) Schedule 2, page 5 (lines 1 to 15), omit the Schedule.*
  • <p>Question agreed to.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Luke Howarth</p>
  • <p>by leave&#8212;I move amendments (1) and (3) on sheet 2, as circulated in my name, together:</p>
  • <p class="italic">(1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 2), omit "Schedules 1 and 2", substitute "Schedule 1".</p>
  • <p class="italic">(3) Schedule 2, page 5 (lines 1 to 15), omit the Schedule.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Milton Dick</p>
  • <p>The question before the House is that the opposition amendments moved by the member for Petrie be agreed to.</p>
  • <p></p>