All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2024-05-29#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2024-08-11 10:06:20
|
Title
Description
-
- The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*". Reading a bill a second time is equivalent to agreeing with the main idea of the bill. If this amendment had been successful, if would have replaced those words with the words below.
- ### Amendment text
- > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
- >
- > *(1) notes this bill is the first legislative response to the Quality of Advice review, which was delivered to the government in December 2022 and commissioned by the former Coalition government;*
- >
- > *(2) notes the significant delay in this bill has caused deep uncertainty for our struggling financial advice sector, who have been slugged by higher fees, higher taxes, and more red tape under this Government;*
- >
- > *(3) notes that despite this significant delay, this bill has several widely publicised drafting errors that would gut the financial advice industry's revenue streams and make it harder for Australians to pay for financial advice through their super; and*
- >
- > *(4) calls on the Government to fix these drafting errors without delay to secure the future of our financial advice and prevent a future where Australians are under-advised, under-insured, and under-banked".*
- ### What does this bill do?
- According to the bill homepage, the bill:
- > *Amends:*
- >
- > * *the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 to provide a legal basis for payment of advice fees from a member’s superannuation account and clarify the associated tax consequences;*
- >
- > * *the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to: ongoing fee renewal and consent requirements; financial services guide requirements; rules banning conflicted remuneration; and standardised consumer consent requirements for certain insurance commissions;*
- >
- > * *the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Act 1987 to: align the petroleum resource rent tax general anti-avoidance provisions with the general anti-avoidance provisions in the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936; and clarify the meaning of ‘exploration for petroleum’;*
- >
- > * *the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 to: clarify mining, quarrying or prospecting rights (MQPRs) cannot be depreciated for income tax purposes until they are used; clarify when income tax balancing adjustments occur to MQPRs; and amend the location offset and producer offset for films;*
- >
- > * *15 Acts to amend the process by which amendments to agreements with multilateral development banks are incorporated into domestic legislation; and*
- >
- > * *8 Acts to make miscellaneous and technical amendments to Treasury portfolio legislation.*
-
-
|
|
representatives vote 2024-05-29#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2024-08-11 10:01:29
|
Title
Bills — Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering Better Financial Outcomes and Other Measures) Bill 2024; Report from Federation Chamber- Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering Better Financial Outcomes and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - Fix drafting errors
Description
<p class="speaker">Milton Dick</p><p>The question before the House is that the amendment be agreed to.</p>-
- The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*". Reading a bill a second time is equivalent to agreeing with the main idea of the bill. If this amendment had been successful, if would have replaced those words with the words below.
- ### Amendment text
- > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
- >
- > *(1) notes this bill is the first legislative response to the Quality of Advice review, which was delivered to the government in December 2022 and commissioned by the former Coalition government;*
- >
- > *(2) notes the significant delay in this bill has caused deep uncertainty for our struggling financial advice sector, who have been slugged by higher fees, higher taxes, and more red tape under this Government;*
- >
- > *(3) notes that despite this significant delay, this bill has several widely publicised drafting errors that would gut the financial advice industry's revenue streams and make it harder for Australians to pay for financial advice through their super; and*
- >
- > *(4) calls on the Government to fix these drafting errors without delay to secure the future of our financial advice and prevent a future where Australians are under-advised, under-insured, and under-banked".*
<p></p><p></p> -
-
|