All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2023-05-31#8
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-08-18 10:17:55
|
Title
Description
-
- The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2023-05-31.22.1) to the usual second reading motion "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). This means the usual motion will remain as it is.
- ### Rebellion
- Bass MP [Bridget Archer](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bass/bridget_archer) (Liberal) rebelled against the Coalition by voting "No" and [explained her reasons](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-05-31.119.1):
- > *While I do support the coalition's policy to increase the earning threshold to $300 a fortnight before the rate of income support is impacted, I will not be supporting the second reading amendment put forward by the member for Deakin, as it calls for the scrapping of the $40 increase. Yes, a job is the best way to improve the living standards of individuals and their families, but I'd say it's a little hard to look for a job if you're starving, cold or can't afford transport. In my view, $40 a fortnight, while a step in the right direction, is not enough and falls short of the coalition's increase of $50 a fortnight in 2021. Whilst I note the government has a fine line to walk between addressing the cost-of-living challenges and addressing inflation, I don't believe that providing this minimal increase to income support, which still falls chronically below the poverty line, is the right approach, nor is it living Labor's own values, particularly as they've promised time and again not to leave any Australian behind.*
- ### Amendment text
- > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
- >
- > *(1) notes:*
- >
- >> *(a) while in Government, the Coalition through disciplined economic management was able to deliver the largest permanent increase to the JobSeeker income support payment;*
- >>
- >> *(b) this increase saw a $50 per fortnight increase in JobSeeker with the income free area increased to $150 per fortnight to support job seekers as they secure employment and re-enter the workforce;*
- >>
- >> *(c) throughout the height of the COVID-19 pandemic the Coalition Government provided $32 billion in emergency support payments;*
- >>
- >> *(d) JobSeeker payment is not meant to be a wage replacement and creating jobs and getting people back into work is the best way to improve the living standards of people and their families;*
- >>
- >> *(e) every taxpayer dollar spent is a dollar that someone else earned;*
- >>
- >> *(f) there are over 840,000 JobSeeker recipients of which more than 75 per cent had no reported earnings, that is, no part-time work; and*
- >>
- >> *(g) the failure of this year's Budget to reduce barriers to work and get Australians to fill over 438,000 job vacancies; and*
- >
- > *(2) calls on the Government to scrap the $40 per fortnight increase to the base rate of working age pensions and implement the Coalition's policy to increase the income free area to $300 a fortnight to allow job seekers to earn more and still retain the full JobSeeker allowance".*
-
-
|
|
representatives vote 2023-05-31#8
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-08-18 10:12:20
|
Title
Bills — Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Strengthening the Safety Net) Bill 2023; Second Reading- Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Strengthening the Safety Net) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Adopt Coalition policy
Description
<p class="speaker">Milton Dick</p><p>The original question was that this bill be now read a second time. To this the honourable member for Deakin moved as an amendment that all words after 'That' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The question before the House now is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Deakin be disagreed to.</p><p></p><p></p> -
- The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2023-05-31.22.1) to the usual second reading motion "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). This means the usual motion will remain as it is.
- ### Amendment text
- > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
- >
- > *(1) notes:*
- >
- >> *(a) while in Government, the Coalition through disciplined economic management was able to deliver the largest permanent increase to the JobSeeker income support payment;*
- >>
- >> *(b) this increase saw a $50 per fortnight increase in JobSeeker with the income free area increased to $150 per fortnight to support job seekers as they secure employment and re-enter the workforce;*
- >>
- >> *(c) throughout the height of the COVID-19 pandemic the Coalition Government provided $32 billion in emergency support payments;*
- >>
- >> *(d) JobSeeker payment is not meant to be a wage replacement and creating jobs and getting people back into work is the best way to improve the living standards of people and their families;*
- >>
- >> *(e) every taxpayer dollar spent is a dollar that someone else earned;*
- >>
- >> *(f) there are over 840,000 JobSeeker recipients of which more than 75 per cent had no reported earnings, that is, no part-time work; and*
- >>
- >> *(g) the failure of this year's Budget to reduce barriers to work and get Australians to fill over 438,000 job vacancies; and*
- >
- > *(2) calls on the Government to scrap the $40 per fortnight increase to the base rate of working age pensions and implement the Coalition's policy to increase the income free area to $300 a fortnight to allow job seekers to earn more and still retain the full JobSeeker allowance".*
-
-
|