All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
representatives vote 2022-08-04#2

Edited by pizza1016

on 2022-08-05 20:39:04

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/25975/&sid=0000) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a [second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*" - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. Because the amendment was unsuccessful, the usual second reading motion will be left unchanged.
  • Note that amendments like this (that is, amendments to second reading motions) do not change the wording of the bill but are instead expressions of the will of the House.
  • ### Crossing the floor
  • Bonner MP [Ross Vasta](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bonner/ross_vasta) (Liberal) [crossed the floor](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/crossing-the-floor/) to vote "No" against the rest of his party, which voted "Yes."
  • ### Mistaken vote
  • During the vote, Kooyong MP [Monique Ryan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/kooyong/monique_ryan) inadvertently voted "Yes" to *disagree* with the amendment. She later [made a mistake in correcting her voting record](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;adv=yes;db=CHAMBER;id=chamber%2Fhansardr%2F25975%2F0055;orderBy=customrank;page=0;query=Dataset%3Ahansardr,hansardr80,hansardrIndex;rec=0;resCount=Default) in the chamber, stating that:
  • > *During the second reading amendment moved by the member for Melbourne today, I cast my vote for the *noes*. This was not my intention. I wish to inform the House I intended to vote with the *ayes*. I thank the House.*
  • > *During the second reading amendment moved by the member for Melbourne today, I cast my vote for the noes. This was not my intention. I wish to inform the House I intended to vote with the ayes. I thank the House.*
  • Taken at face value, this would have reaffirmed that she was indeed voting "Yes" to *disagree* with the amendment. However, [she clarified her actual stance on Twitter](https://twitter.com/Mon4Kooyong/status/1555015177678245888), which is to support the amendment by voting "No" against *disagreeing* with the amendment, writing that:
  • > *I should note: in the flurry of divisions this morning (among my first on the job!) I made a mistake, & my vote on [@AdamBandt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/melbourne/adam_bandt) amendment was counted contrary to my intention.*
  • >
  • > *As I’ve consistently stated: Australia must not open new coal mines, gas fields or fossil fuel projects.*
  • The voting record below does not reflect this correction, as votes are, in most cases, final.
  • ### Amendment text
  • > *That all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
  • >
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House acknowledges that for the Government to reach their target of Net Zero by 2050, not one new coal, oil or gas project can commence"*
representatives vote 2022-08-04#2

Edited by pizza1016

on 2022-08-05 18:24:57

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/25975/&sid=0000) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a [second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*" - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. Because the amendment was unsuccessful, the usual second reading motion will be left unchanged.
  • Note that amendments like this (that is, amendments to second reading motions) do not change the wording of the bill but are instead expressions of the will of the House.
  • ### Crossing the floor
  • Bonner MP [Ross Vasta](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bonner/ross_vasta) (Liberal) [crossed the floor](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/crossing-the-floor/) to vote "No" against the rest of his party, which voted "Yes."
  • ### Mistaken vote
  • During the vote, Kooyong MP [Monique Ryan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/kooyong/monique_ryan) inadvertently voted "Yes" to *disagree* with the amendment. She later [made a mistake in correcting her voting record](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;adv=yes;db=CHAMBER;id=chamber%2Fhansardr%2F25975%2F0055;orderBy=customrank;page=0;query=Dataset%3Ahansardr,hansardr80,hansardrIndex;rec=0;resCount=Default) in the chamber, stating that:
  • > *During the second reading amendment moved by the member for Melbourne today, I cast my vote for the *noes*. This was not my intention. I wish to inform the House I intended to vote with the *ayes*. I thank the House.*
  • Taken at face value, this would have reaffirmed that she was indeed voting "Yes" to *disagree* with the amendment. However, [she clarified her actual stance on Twitter](https://twitter.com/Mon4Kooyong/status/1555015177678245888), which is to support the amendment by voting "No" against *disagreeing* with the amendment, writing that:
  • > *I should note: in the flurry of divisions this morning (among my first on the job!) I made a mistake, & my vote on [@AdamBandt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/melbourne/adam_bandt) amendment was counted contrary to my intention.*
  • >
  • > *As I’ve consistently stated: **Australia must not open new coal mines, gas fields or fossil fuel projects.** *
  • > *As I’ve consistently stated: Australia must not open new coal mines, gas fields or fossil fuel projects.*
  • The voting record below does not reflect this correction, as votes are, in most cases, final.
  • ### Amendment text
  • > *That all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
  • >
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House acknowledges that for the Government to reach their target of Net Zero by 2050, not one new coal, oil or gas project can commence"*
representatives vote 2022-08-04#2

Edited by pizza1016

on 2022-08-05 18:24:32

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/25975/&sid=0000) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a [second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*" - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. Because the amendment was unsuccessful, the usual second reading motion will be left unchanged.
  • Note that amendments like this (that is, amendments to second reading motions) do not change the wording of the bill but are instead expressions of the will of the House.
  • ### Crossing the floor
  • Bonner MP [Ross Vasta](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bonner/ross_vasta) (Liberal) [crossed the floor](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/crossing-the-floor/) to vote "No" against the rest of his party, which voted "Yes."
  • ### Mistaken vote
  • During the vote, Kooyong MP [Monique Ryan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/kooyong/monique_ryan) inadvertently voted "Yes" to *disagree* with the amendment. She later [made a mistake in correcting her voting record](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;adv=yes;db=CHAMBER;id=chamber%2Fhansardr%2F25975%2F0055;orderBy=customrank;page=0;query=Dataset%3Ahansardr,hansardr80,hansardrIndex;rec=0;resCount=Default) in the chamber, stating that:
  • > *During the second reading amendment moved by the member for Melbourne today, I cast my vote for the *noes*. This was not my intention. I wish to inform the House I intended to vote with the *ayes*. I thank the House.*
  • Taken at face value, this would have reaffirmed that she was indeed voting "Yes" to *disagree* with the amendment. However, [she clarified her actual stance on Twitter](https://twitter.com/Mon4Kooyong/status/1555015177678245888), which is to support the amendment by voting "No" against *disagreeing* with the amendment, writing that:
  • > *I should note: in the flurry of divisions this morning (among my first on the job!) I made a mistake, & my vote on [@AdamBandt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/melbourne/adam_bandt) amendment was counted contrary to my intention.*
  • >
  • > *As I’ve consistently stated: **Australia must not open new coal mines, gas fields or fossil fuel projects.***
  • > *As I’ve consistently stated: **Australia must not open new coal mines, gas fields or fossil fuel projects.** *
  • The voting record below does not reflect this correction, as votes are, in most cases, final.
  • ### Amendment text
  • > *That all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
  • >
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House acknowledges that for the Government to reach their target of Net Zero by 2050, not one new coal, oil or gas project can commence"*
representatives vote 2022-08-04#2

Edited by pizza1016

on 2022-08-05 18:24:08

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/25975/&sid=0000) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a [second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*" - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. Because the amendment was unsuccessful, the usual second reading motion will be left unchanged.
  • Note that amendments like this (that is, amendments to second reading motions) do not change the wording of the bill but are instead expressions of the will of the House.
  • ### Crossing the floor
  • Bonner MP [Ross Vasta](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bonner/ross_vasta) (Liberal) [crossed the floor](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/crossing-the-floor/) to vote "No" against the rest of his party, which voted "Yes."
  • ### Mistaken vote
  • During the vote, Kooyong MP [Monique Ryan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/kooyong/monique_ryan) inadvertently voted "Yes" to *disagree* with the amendment. She later [made a mistake in correcting her voting record](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;adv=yes;db=CHAMBER;id=chamber%2Fhansardr%2F25975%2F0055;orderBy=customrank;page=0;query=Dataset%3Ahansardr,hansardr80,hansardrIndex;rec=0;resCount=Default) in the chamber, stating that:
  • > *During the second reading amendment moved by the member for Melbourne today, I cast my vote for the *noes*. This was not my intention. I wish to inform the House I intended to vote with the *ayes*. I thank the House.*
  • Taken at face value, this would have reaffirmed that she was indeed voting "Yes" to *disagree* with the amendment. However, [she clarified her actual stance on Twitter](https://twitter.com/Mon4Kooyong/status/1555015177678245888), which is to support the amendment by voting "No" against *disagreeing* with the amendment, writing that:
  • > *I should note: in the flurry of divisions this morning (among my first on the job!) I made a mistake, & my vote on [@AdamBandt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/melbourne/adam_bandt) amendment was counted contrary to my intention.*
  • >
  • > *As I’ve consistently stated: **Australia must not open new coal mines, gas fields or fossil fuel projects.***
  • The voting record below does not reflect this correction, as votes are, in most cases, final.
  • ### Amendment text
  • > *That all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
  • >
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House acknowledges that for the Government to reach their target of Net Zero by 2050, not one new coal, oil or gas project can commence"*
representatives vote 2022-08-04#2

Edited by mackay staff

on 2022-08-05 10:26:32

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/25975/&sid=0000) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a [second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*" - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. Because the amendment was unsuccessful, the usual second reading motion will be left unchanged.
  • Note that amendments like this (that is, amendments to second reading motions) do not change the wording of the bill but are instead expressions of the will of the House.
  • ### Crossing the floor
  • Bonner MP [Ross Vasta](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bonner/ross_vasta) (Liberal) [crossed the floor](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/crossing-the-floor/) to vote "No" against the rest of his party, which voted "No."
  • Bonner MP [Ross Vasta](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bonner/ross_vasta) (Liberal) [crossed the floor](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/crossing-the-floor/) to vote "No" against the rest of his party, which voted "Yes."
  • ### Amendment text
  • > *That all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
  • >
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House acknowledges that for the Government to reach their target of Net Zero by 2050, not one new coal, oil or gas project can commence"*
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House acknowledges that for the Government to reach their target of Net Zero by 2050, not one new coal, oil or gas project can commence"*
representatives vote 2022-08-04#2

Edited by mackay staff

on 2022-08-05 10:17:57

Title

  • Bills — Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022; Second Reading
  • Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - On new fossil fuel projects

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Milton Dick</p>
  • <p>The original question was that the bills be now read a second time. To this, the honourable member for Melbourne has moved, as an amendment, that all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. Is a division required? I will ask the clerks to ring the bell for five minutes so all members will be aware of the division. The question is that the amendment be disagreed to.</p>
  • The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/25975/&sid=0000) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a [second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*" - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. Because the amendment was unsuccessful, the usual second reading motion will be left unchanged.
  • Note that amendments like this (that is, amendments to second reading motions) do not change the wording of the bill but are instead expressions of the will of the House.
  • ### Crossing the floor
  • Bonner MP [Ross Vasta](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bonner/ross_vasta) (Liberal) [crossed the floor](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/crossing-the-floor/) to vote "No" against the rest of his party, which voted "No."
  • ### Amendment text
  • > *That all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
  • >
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House acknowledges that for the Government to reach their target of Net Zero by 2050, not one new coal, oil or gas project can commence"*
  • <p></p>
  • <p></p>