All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2021-11-23#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2021-12-10 14:10:12
|
Title
Description
-
The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* of an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2021-11-23.95.2) to the usual second reading motion, which is that the the bill be read [for a second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/) - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. Because this vote passed, the amendment failed.- The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* of an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2021-11-23.95.2) to the usual second reading motion, which is that the the bill be read [for a second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/) - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. Because this vote passed, the amendment failed. It was introduced by Barton MP [Linda Burney](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/barton/linda_burney) (Labor).
- ### Amendment text
- > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: "whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
- >
- > *(1) notes:*
- >
- >> *(a) the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse estimated 60,000 survivors would be eligible for redress;*
- >>
- >> *(b) as of March 2021, after almost three years of operation, the National Redress Scheme had seen only 5,275 payments made;*
- >>
- >> *(c) the average processing time for a claim under the Scheme is over a year; and*
- >>
- >> *(d) the Government has not implemented all the recommendations of the two-year review of the National Redress Scheme; and*
- >
- > *(2) calls on the Government to work with states and territories to:*
- >
- >> *(a) lift the cap on Redress payments to $200,000, as recommended by the Royal Commission;*
- >>
- >> *(b) fix the assessment matrix so it properly takes into account the impact of abuse; and*
- >>
- >> *(c) provide ongoing support for survivors".*
-
-
|
|
representatives vote 2021-11-23#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2021-12-10 14:09:32
|
Title
Bills — National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Amendment (Funders of Last Resort and Other Measures) Bill 2021; Second Reading- National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Amendment (Funders of Last Resort and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Support and redress
Description
<p class='motion-notice motion-notice-truncated'>Long debate text truncated.</p>-
- The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* of an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2021-11-23.95.2) to the usual second reading motion, which is that the the bill be read [for a second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/) - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. Because this vote passed, the amendment failed.
- ### Amendment text
- > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: "whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
- >
- > *(1) notes:*
- >
- >> *(a) the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse estimated 60,000 survivors would be eligible for redress;*
- >>
- >> *(b) as of March 2021, after almost three years of operation, the National Redress Scheme had seen only 5,275 payments made;*
- >>
- >> *(c) the average processing time for a claim under the Scheme is over a year; and*
- >>
- >> *(d) the Government has not implemented all the recommendations of the two-year review of the National Redress Scheme; and*
- >
- > *(2) calls on the Government to work with states and territories to:*
- >
- >> *(a) lift the cap on Redress payments to $200,000, as recommended by the Royal Commission;*
- >>
- >> *(b) fix the assessment matrix so it properly takes into account the impact of abuse; and*
- >>
- >> *(c) provide ongoing support for survivors".*
-
-
|