All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
representatives vote 2021-06-01#7

Edited by mackay

on 2021-06-03 14:15:09

Title

  • Bills — Private Health Insurance Amendment (Income Thresholds) Bill 2021; Second Reading
  • Private Health Insurance Amendment (Income Thresholds) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Keep usual second reading motion unchanged

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Michael Sukkar</p>
  • <p>This bill, the Private Health Insurance Amendment (Income Thresholds) Bill 2021, implements a 2021 budget measure. Importantly, it provides stability regarding the application of these two important private health insurance incentives to consumers and other stakeholders while a detailed study is undertaken to ensure the regulatory settings are appropriate to encourage participation and support affordable premiums. I want to thank members for their contributions to the debate on this bill.</p>
  • <p>The bill amends the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 to extend the current income thresholds that apply to the private health insurance rebate and the Medicare levy surcharge for another two years and ensures annual indexation of thresholds recommences from 2023-24. The bill maintains indexation based on Australian Bureau of Statistics average weekly ordinary time earnings. The bill makes no changes to the Medicare levy surcharge rates or the private health insurance rebate rates.</p>
  • The majority voted in favour of keeping the usual [second reading motion](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/) unchanged. The usual second reading motion is "*that the bill be read a second time*", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill.
  • This vote took place after the MP for Hindmarsh [Mark Butler](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/hindmarsh/mark_butler) (Labor) proposed the following amendment.
  • ### Amendment text
  • > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
  • >
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House urges the Government to better protect Australians' health during the pandemic and deliver a more sustainable, equitable, and effective health care system"*
  • <p>The Private Health Insurance Act 2007, as amended, continues to incentivise higher income earners to financially contribute towards their own healthcare costs by purchasing private health insurance hospital cover or pay the Medicare levy surcharge. The bill gives certainty for consumers who rely on these arrangements to choose and compare private health insurance policies and services that are right for them. The pause means that $90,000 remains the base income tier threshold for Medicare levy surcharge for a single's individual policy and $180,000 for a couple's and family's policy. The Medicare levy surcharge and private health insurance rebate tier arrangements continue to be income tested each financial year.</p>
  • <p>The bill means that, if individuals' or couples' and families' incomes continue to be lower than the relevant income thresholds, they continue to be eligible to receive a government rebate towards their private health insurance policy premium.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p>
  • <p>The original question was that this bill be now read a second time. To this the honourable member for Hindmarsh has moved as an amendment that all words after 'That' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The immediate question before the House is that the words proposed to be omitted stand part of the question.</p>