All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
representatives vote 2021-03-17#1

Edited by mackay staff

on 2021-03-18 14:46:48

Title

Description

  • The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with the [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-03-17.23.1) introduced by Melbourne MP [Adam Bandt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/melbourne/adam_bandt) (Greens Leader), which means it failed.
  • ### Amended motion text
  • > *That the following words be added after "education services":*
  • >
  • > *"; and*
  • >
  • > *(d) increase the Jobseeker Payment to above the poverty line."*
  • ### Original motion text
  • > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
  • >
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a [second reading](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/), the House:*
  • >
  • > *(1) notes that:*
  • >
  • >> *(a) the effect of this bill will be to cut unemployment payments by $100 per fortnight at the end of March, at the same time as JobKeeper is ending; and*
  • >>
  • >> *(b) over 1.3 million people are on unemployment payments—almost double the number before the pandemic; and*
  • >
  • > *(2) calls on the Government to:*
  • >
  • >> *(a) abandon its counterproductive and punitive plans for a dob-in-a-jobseeker hotline that will only make life harder for job seekers and employers by further increasing mutual obligation requirements at a time when unemployment and underemployment is high;*
  • >>
  • >> *(b) consider allowing people to keep more of their earnings from part-time, casual or seasonal work, to help people move into employment; and*
  • >>
  • >> *(c) do more to support Australians facing poverty and hardship—through adequate payments to those who need them, housing, addressing child poverty, and better health and education services"*
  • >> *(c) do more to support Australians facing poverty and hardship—through adequate payments to those who need them, housing, addressing child poverty, and better health and education services"*
representatives vote 2021-03-17#1

Edited by mackay staff

on 2021-03-18 14:46:13

Title

  • Bills — Social Services Legislation Amendment (Strengthening Income Support) Bill 2021; Second Reading
  • Social Services Legislation Amendment (Strengthening Income Support) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Raise Jobseeker Payment

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p>
  • <p>If it suits the House I will state the question in the form that the words proposed to be omitted stand part of the question. I call the honourable member for Perth in continuation.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Patrick Gorman</p>
  • The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with the [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-03-17.23.1) introduced by Melbourne MP [Adam Bandt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/melbourne/adam_bandt) (Greens Leader), which means it failed.
  • ### Amended motion text
  • > *That the following words be added after "education services":*
  • >
  • > *"; and*
  • >
  • > *(d) increase the Jobseeker Payment to above the poverty line."*
  • ### Original motion text
  • > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
  • >
  • > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
  • >
  • > *(1) notes that:*
  • >
  • >> *(a) the effect of this bill will be to cut unemployment payments by $100 per fortnight at the end of March, at the same time as JobKeeper is ending; and*
  • >>
  • >> *(b) over 1.3 million people are on unemployment payments—almost double the number before the pandemic; and*
  • >
  • > *(2) calls on the Government to:*
  • >
  • >> *(a) abandon its counterproductive and punitive plans for a dob-in-a-jobseeker hotline that will only make life harder for job seekers and employers by further increasing mutual obligation requirements at a time when unemployment and underemployment is high;*
  • >>
  • >> *(b) consider allowing people to keep more of their earnings from part-time, casual or seasonal work, to help people move into employment; and*
  • >>
  • >> *(c) do more to support Australians facing poverty and hardship—through adequate payments to those who need them, housing, addressing child poverty, and better health and education services"*
  • <p>This bill does not lift people out of poverty; it simply makes them less poor. Proper poverty elimination must be one of the most important things that we do in this place, for Australians at home and for those who live in poverty abroad. We are a rich, successful multicultural country, but we do leave too many people behind.</p>
  • <p>When we look at the government, we see that they don't have a plan for the many layered challenge of lifting people out of poverty. This is the government that froze the Medicare rebate. This is the government that has no plan to grow the stock of social housing. This is the government that killed the Gonski reforms, which we know were key to lifting people out of intergenerational poverty. They starved our universities of JobKeeper. And, from what we've seen so far, it looks like the aged-care royal commission will go the same way as the banking royal commission. They hate investing in public services and have done nothing to lower the cost of public transport, despite having been in office for more than seven years. And, in the middle of a pandemic, when I asked the government if they could guarantee that the Morley Centrelink in my electorate would stay open&#8212;the Centrelink that thousands and thousands of people go to to access and apply for JobSeeker&#8212;I couldn't even get that guarantee.</p>
  • <p>There is no doubt that we do need a more comprehensive review of how we deal with poverty elimination in this country. Yesterday the member for Canberra said that we need to do a more comprehensive review, rather than just throwing a few dollars around, and I think that is definitely the way to go. I say to the 1.95 million Australians who rely on these payments: Labor is on your side. Reducing poverty will be made a priority in every budget of an Albanese Labor government. We are still in the middle of a pandemic, and we don't know what happens next. Of course, the government must keep all options on the table, including ongoing COVID supplements, to deal with what is thrown at our economy in the weeks and months ahead.</p>
  • <p>We also need to recognise that it's not only the amount that we give people that is important but also their ability to access these funds. That means quality Centrelink services, secure jobs for the people who work at Centrelink and proper resources so that the call centre waiting times don't blow out, as we've experienced in the last 12 months. We need to make sure that the physical shopfronts for Centrelink continue to be there, because that is the preferred method of interaction with government services for many, many people. We also need to acknowledge that, while we might be providing a very small increase for those on JobSeeker, this government has overseen some huge increases in the cost of living. We know the devastating impact of the government's failure on energy policy and energy prices. We've seen increases in childcare fees. There was a 5.6 per cent increase in childcare fees last year, and the fees are projected to increase 4.1 per cent for each of the next four years. In fact, since it was elected in 2013, this government's record is a 35.6 per cent increase in childcare fees. We know that they froze the Medicare rebate. This government also has a unique ability to refuse to accept when it gets it wrong, as we saw with the embarrassing robodebt saga, which this government pretended didn't exist.</p>
  • <p>I will end my remarks by referring to one of the many pieces of correspondence I've received from constituents in the Perth electorate, urging this place to do more when it comes to JobSeeker. I won't name the constituent. She writes: 'I'm a sole parent without another adult to help support and raise my amazing child. JobSeeker puts us in poverty, not just me but my child. Poverty is exhausting. Nobody wants to be on JobSeeker. Do you know how stressful it is being so broke, let alone managing life?' I think the reality is that, for many of us in this place, we are fortunate to not know how stressful that is, but that doesn't in any way absolve us of the responsibility to do a lot more to lift our fellow Australians out of poverty.</p>
  • <p class='motion-notice motion-notice-truncated'>Long debate text truncated.</p>