|
representatives vote 2019-09-10#11
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2019-09-27 15:27:04
|
Title
Bills — National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2); First Reading- National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) - First Reading - Speed things along
Description
<p class="speaker">Christian Porter</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the second reading be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</p>- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2019-09-10.121.4) to speed things along by putting [the question](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/representatives/2019-09-10/12). That is, voting on the question now rather than debating it further.
<p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>I'll state the question. All those of that opinion say 'aye'; to the contrary 'no'—</p><p class="italic">Mr Bandt interjecting—</p> <p class="speaker">Christian Porter</p><p>Mr Deputy Speaker, you need to state the question.</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>I've already stated the question.</p> <p class="speaker">Christian Porter</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the motion be put.</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>The question is that the second reading be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</p><p class="italic">Mr Bandt interjecting—</p><p>I call the honourable the Attorney-General.</p> <p class="speaker">Christian Porter</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the motion be put.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>I'm speaking to the motion. I rose first. Mr Deputy Speaker, a point of order: I was on my feet first, before the Attorney-General and after the motion was put. I'm seeking to speak to the motion.</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>I'm sorry, I didn't see that. I only saw the Attorney-General.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>The tape will clearly show that I was on my feet first, seeking to speak to the motion of the Attorney-General. There's absolutely no reason why we can't have a debate on this motion with the call being given to the person who rose first.</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>I thank the honourable member for Melbourne, but I've made my decision. The question is that the second reading be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>I'm sorry, Mr Deputy Speaker Vasta. We're entitled to have a vote on that. There is no gag; we're entitled to have a debate on that question, and I'm seeking the call on that question. This is extraordinary! You have just put the question twice and you are refusing to allow debate on this question!</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>Order! I call the honourable member for Melbourne.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. I move:</p><p class="italic">That all words after 'That' be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:</p><p class="italic">The motion for the second reading be proceeded with immediately.</p><p>We can have an ICAC today and we should have an ICAC today—</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>Order! I call the honourable Attorney-General.</p> <p class="speaker">Christian Porter</p><p>Again, I move:</p><p class="italic">That the question be put.</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>The Manager of Opposition Business on a point of order.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Burke</p><p>The actual moving of the motion just done by the Leader of the House was done after he'd left the dispatch box and while he was seated. When he actually said the words, 'I move that the question be put,' he had left the dispatch box and sat down, because he got the words wrong when he was at the dispatch box.</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>That's right, but I gave him the call.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Burke</p><p>Yes, I know you gave him the call, but he didn't move anything when you gave him the call. He then sat down, realised he'd said the wrong thing and from his seat said that he moved the question be put. That doesn't count!</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>But he hadn't finished what he was saying.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Burke</p><p>He was sitting down!</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>I didn't see him fully sit down.</p><p>An honourable member: He had his foot on the chair!</p><p>The member for Melbourne, on a point of order.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>I have moved, as an amendment, that the motion for the second reading be proceeded with immediately. The Leader of the House has not moved that the member no longer be heard; what he's moved is something else. But, I having moved that, the appropriate thing to do now is to call for whether there is a seconder to that. It's not to move that the question be put, because I have moved a separate motion that needs seconding.</p> <p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p><p>The question now is that the question be put. That's my ruling; that's the advice from the clerks and that's what I'm going for. So that's the question: that the question be put.</p><p>Honourable members interjecting —</p><p>The question is that the second reading amendment be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>Mr Deputy Speaker, I was given the call and I moved an amendment—</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>I will just say to the member for Melbourne that he hasn't got the call at the moment, so no-one is hearing what he's saying. I've been following proceedings, and there are two issues. One was the allocation of the call. I say to the Deputy Speaker that he needs to call the person who he believes rose first. I've heard his explanation for that and I don't think that's at issue. If the member for Melbourne finds that an issue, there is ample precedence where the government can take responsibility for a bill such as this. I could go through them at great length, which I don't think I need to do.</p><p>Once the question is then stated, the member for Melbourne is entitled to move an amendment, which I understand he has done. At that point the motion can be moved that the question be put. I heard the member for Melbourne say—and I think that he obviously believes this to be the case—that the Deputy Speaker should be calling for a seconder. That's not the case, because the question before the chair isn't the amendment. It's well written up in the <i>Practice</i>. I'm happy to take the member for Melbourne through it; in fact, the opposition has been in exactly this predicament many times. Until an amendment is moved, seconded and then stated and before the House, the motion that the Leader of the House moved is quite right. It does seem like a steamroller, but that's how the standing orders are.</p><p>In order not to detain the House, I was watching carefully in my office. I'm happy to be corrected, but the motion before the House was the amendment moved by the member for Melbourne. Whilst it might surprise the member for Melbourne, the Leader of the House is quite entitled to put the motion 'that the motion be put' at any time through member for Melbourne's speech, at any time through any seconder's speech, at any time up until the question before the House is 'that the amendment be agreed to', and we're nowhere near that. I'll hear from the member for Melbourne.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>Just for clarification so I understand, given that this has all moved very quickly: in simple terms, the motion has come from the Senate. The bill has been read a first time. The government said, 'Defer the matter.' I moved an amendment to say, 'No, consider it immediately.'</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>That's right.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>There will be no debate on my amendment about whether we consider it immediately or not because the Attorney-General is, in effect, gagging the whole debate and moving the question. If I understand correctly, and so I know which way to sit, the question that's being put is not the amendment about considering it immediately—</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>That's right.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>because that has not been allowed to proceed, but we're considering the original motion as moved by the Attorney-General.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>I'm impartial and just follow the standing orders. The motion that the Leader of the House has moved, that the question be put, must be put immediately without debate. That will be on the question that the Leader of the House has moved, not your amendment. In terms of your language, you're entitled to describe it any way, but, as Speaker, I need to describe it as: he is acting entirely within the standing orders and within the <i>Practice</i>. The Manager of Opposition Business.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Burke</p><p>The only remaining issue that had arisen was whether the motion 'that the question be now put' was, in fact, moved from the dispatch box or not.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>Okay. I think there are two different arguments happening here. The Manager of Opposition Business is saying that the Leader of the House has not yet put the motion 'that the motion be put'. I'll call the member for Melbourne on his amendment.</p> <p class="speaker">Adam Bandt</p><p>We can have an ICAC today and we should have an ICAC today—</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>I ask the member for Melbourne to resume this seat, and I call the Leader of the House.</p> <p class="speaker">Christian Porter</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the question be now put.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>The question is that the motion be put.</p>
|