All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2018-12-05#12
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-06-02 10:49:36
|
Title
Description
-
- The majority voted against a motion introduced by Port Adelaide MP [Mark Butler](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/hindmarsh/mark_butler), which means it failed. The motion was to suspend the usual procedural rules - known as [standing orders](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/standing-orders/) - in order to let another vote happen.
- ### Rebel voter
- There was one rebel in this vote, with Chisholm MP [Julia Banks](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/chisholm/julia_banks) (Liberal) crossing the floor to vote 'Yes' against the rest of the Liberal Party, which voted 'No.'
- ### Motion text
- > *That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for Port Adelaide from moving the following motion immediately:*
- >
- >> *The House:*
- >>
- >> *(1) notes the Government has failed to observe all due processes to allow Members, businesses and State Governments to properly scrutinise legislation presented to the House today; and*
- >>
>> *(2) calls on the Government to schedule this bill for debate in the first sitting week of 2019.*- >> *(2) calls on the Government to schedule this bill [Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2018] for debate in the first sitting week of 2019.*
-
-
|
|
representatives vote 2018-12-05#12
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-06-02 10:43:36
|
Title
Motions - Consideration of Legislation - Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2018- Motions - Consideration of Legislation - Let another vote take place
Description
-
- The majority voted against a motion introduced by Port Adelaide MP [Mark Butler](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/hindmarsh/mark_butler), which means it failed. The motion was to suspend the usual procedural rules - known as [standing orders](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/standing-orders/) - in order to let another vote happen.
- ### Rebel voter
- There was one rebel in this vote, with Chisholm MP [Julia Banks](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/chisholm/julia_banks) (Liberal) crossing the floor to vote 'Yes' against the rest of the Liberal Party, which voted 'No.'
- ### Motion text
- > *That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for Port Adelaide from moving the following motion immediately:*
- >
- >> *The House:*
- >>
- >> *(1) notes the Government has failed to observe all due processes to allow Members, businesses and State Governments to properly scrutinise legislation presented to the House today; and*
- >>
>> *(2) calls on the Government to schedule this bill for debate in the first sitting week of 2019.*- >> *(2) calls on the Government to schedule this bill for debate in the first sitting week of 2019.*
-
-
|
|
representatives vote 2018-12-05#12
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-06-02 10:42:38
|
Title
Motions — Consideration of Legislation- Motions - Consideration of Legislation - Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2018
Description
<p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>The question is that the motion moved by the member for Port Adelaide be agreed to.</p>-
- The majority voted against a motion introduced by Port Adelaide MP [Mark Butler](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/hindmarsh/mark_butler), which means it failed. The motion was to suspend the usual procedural rules - known as [standing orders](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/standing-orders/) - in order to let another vote happen.
- ### Rebel voter
- There was one rebel in this vote, with Chisholm MP [Julia Banks](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/chisholm/julia_banks) (Liberal) crossing the floor to vote 'Yes' against the rest of the Liberal Party, which voted 'No.'
- ### Motion text
- > *That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for Port Adelaide from moving the following motion immediately:*
- >
- >> *The House:*
- >>
- >> *(1) notes the Government has failed to observe all due processes to allow Members, businesses and State Governments to properly scrutinise legislation presented to the House today; and*
- >>
- >> *(2) calls on the Government to schedule this bill for debate in the first sitting week of 2019.*
-
-
|