All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
representatives vote 2016-11-28#3

Edited by mackay staff

on 2019-06-06 14:12:51

Title

  • Motions Attorney-General
  • Motions - Attorney-General - Let a vote happen

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p>
  • <p>The question is that the motion moved by the Manager of Opposition Business be agreed to.</p>
  • The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2016-11-28.26.2) introduced by Watson MP [Tony Burke](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/watson/tony_burke) (Labor), which means it failed.
  • ### Motion text
  • > *That so much of the [standing orders and session orders](https://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/standing-orders.html) be suspended as would prevent the Manager of Opposition Business from moving the following motion forthwith:*
  • >
  • > *That the House:*
  • >
  • > *(1) notes:*
  • >
  • >> *(a) revelations the Attorney-General acted against the interests of the Commonwealth by entering into a corrupt deal to give $300 million of taxpayer funds to the WA Liberal Government;*
  • >>
  • >> *(b) the Attorney-General made this decision despite clear legal advice that the $300 million rightfully belonged to the Australian taxpayer;*
  • >>
  • >> *(c) further revelations that other Ministers in the Prime Minister’s Cabinet have been implicated in this scandal, including the:*
  • >>
  • >>> *(i) Minister for Revenue who was named in the WA Parliament for her involvement in the scandal when she was Assistant Treasurer;*
  • >>>
  • >>> *(ii) Minister for Social Services who was named in the WA Parliament for his involvement in the scandal while he was Assistant Minister to the now former Prime Minister and Member for Warringah; and*
  • >>>
  • >>> *(iii) Treasurer and the Minister for Finance who have direct portfolio interest and who have not yet explained their involvement in the scandal; and*
  • >
  • > *(2) therefore, calls on the Minister representing the Attorney-General, the Minister for Revenue, the Minister for Social Services, the Treasurer and the Prime Minister to attend the House and provide a full account of their offices’ involvement in this scandal.*