All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2016-05-05#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2016-08-23 13:06:47
|
Title
Motions — Budget- Motions - Budget - Stop MP Chris Bowen from speaking
Description
<p class="speaker">Chris Bowen</p><p>I seek leave of the House to move the following motion:</p><p class="italic">That the House:</p>- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2016-05-05.26.1) to stop Labor MP [Chris Bowen](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/mcmahon/chris_bowen) from speaking.
- This means that Mr Bowen won't be able to speak anymore in this debate.
- ### Motion text
- > *That the member be no longer heard.*
<p class="italic">  </p><p class="italic">(1) notes that in an extraordinary interview with David Speers on Sky News this morning:</p><p class="italic">(a) the Prime Minister said that Treasury “has not identified the dollar cost” of the centrepiece of his Budget, the 10-year tax cut for big business:</p><p class="italic">(i) but a moment later, the Prime Minister said Treasury had modelled the cost; and</p><p class="italic">(ii) yet later, the Prime Minister said the cost of his centrepiece 10-year tax cut for big business was outlined on page 3-11 of Budget Paper No. 1 despite the fact, that page does not mention companies or corporations or small businesses even once; and</p><p class="italic">(b) the Prime Minister said the $55 billion cost of his centrepiece 10-year tax cut for big business nominated by economist Chris Richardson “may well be right”;</p><p class="italic">(2) condemns the Prime Minister for delivering a Budget which is a fraud on the Australian people by having a centrepiece without a cost attached; and</p><p class="italic">(3) calls on the Prime Minister to attend the House to finally come clean about the 10-year cost for the 10-year tax cut for big business.</p><p>Leave not granted.</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the member for McMahon from moving the following motion forthwith:</p><p class="italic">(1) notes that in an extraordinary interview with David Speers on Sky News this morning:</p><p class="italic">(a) the Prime Minister said that Treasury “has not identified the dollar cost” of the centrepiece of his Budget, the 10-year tax cut for big business:</p><p class="italic">(i) but a moment later, the Prime Minister said Treasury had modelled the cost; and</p><p class="italic">(ii) yet later, the Prime Minister said the cost of his centrepiece 10-year tax cut for big business was outlined on page 3-11 of Budget Paper No. 1 despite the fact, that page does not mention companies or corporations or small businesses even once; and</p><p class="italic">(b) the Prime Minister said the $55 billion cost of his centrepiece 10-year tax cut for big business nominated by economist Chris Richardson “may well be right”;</p><p class="italic">(2) condemns the Prime Minister for delivering a Budget which is a fraud on the Australian people by having a centrepiece without a cost attached; and</p><p class="italic">(3) calls on the Prime Minister to attend the House to finally come clean about the 10-year cost for the 10-year tax cut for big business.</p><p>It takes a particular level of incompetence to bring down a budget with a centrepiece uncosted—incompetence and a fraud by this Prime Minister.</p> <p class="speaker">Christopher Pyne</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the member be no longer heard.</p> <p class="speaker">Russell Broadbent</p><p>The question is that the member be no longer heard.</p>
|