|
representatives vote 2014-09-01#13
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2016-10-01 20:25:51
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2014-08-28.16.1) introduced by Labor MP [Mark Butler](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?house=representatives&mpc=Port_Adelaide&mpn=Mark_Butler), which means that it was rejected.The motion criticised the government's plan to abolish the [Australian Renewable Energy Agency](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency) (ARENA). However, it did not go so far as to decline to give the bill a [second reading](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html)".(When the House gives a bill a second reading, it means that the majority of the House agrees with the main idea of the bill. )_Background to the bill_The bill was introduced to abolish the [Australian Renewable Energy Agency](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency) (ARENA),(Read more about ARENA on the organisation's [website](http://arena.gov.au/about-arena/).) which is an independent agency that was established in 2012 to manage the government's renewable energy programs. It has two objectives:- to improve the competitiveness of [renewable energy](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy) technologies; and- to increase the supply of renewable energy in Australia.- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2014-08-28.16.1) introduced by Labor MP [Mark Butler](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?house=representatives&mpc=Port_Adelaide&mpn=Mark_Butler), which means that it was rejected.
- The motion criticised the government's plan to abolish the [Australian Renewable Energy Agency](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency) (ARENA). However, it did not go so far as to decline to give the bill a [second reading](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). When the House gives a bill a second reading, it means that the majority of the House agrees with the main idea of the bill.
- ### Background to the bill
- The bill was introduced to abolish the [Australian Renewable Energy Agency](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency) (ARENA), which is an independent agency that was established in 2012 to manage the government's renewable energy programs. It has two objectives:
- * to improve the competitiveness of [renewable energy](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy) technologies; and
- * to increase the supply of renewable energy in Australia.
|
|
representatives vote 2014-09-01#13
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:22:25
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2014-08-28.16.1 motion] introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?house=representatives&mpc=Port_Adelaide&mpn=Mark_Butler Mark Butler], which means that it was rejected.The motion criticised the government's plan to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA). However, it did not go so far as to decline to give the bill a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second reading]".(When the House gives a bill a second reading, it means that the majority of the House agrees with the main idea of the bill.
) ''Background to the bill''The bill was introduced to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA),(Read more about ARENA on the organisation's [http://arena.gov.au/about-arena/ website].) which is an independent agency that was established in 2012 to manage the government's renewable energy programs. It has two objectives:* to improve the competitiveness of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy renewable energy] technologies; and * to increase the supply of renewable energy in Australia.- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2014-08-28.16.1) introduced by Labor MP [Mark Butler](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?house=representatives&mpc=Port_Adelaide&mpn=Mark_Butler), which means that it was rejected.
- The motion criticised the government's plan to abolish the [Australian Renewable Energy Agency](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency) (ARENA). However, it did not go so far as to decline to give the bill a [second reading](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html)".(When the House gives a bill a second reading, it means that the majority of the House agrees with the main idea of the bill. )
- _Background to the bill_
- The bill was introduced to abolish the [Australian Renewable Energy Agency](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency) (ARENA),(Read more about ARENA on the organisation's [website](http://arena.gov.au/about-arena/).) which is an independent agency that was established in 2012 to manage the government's renewable energy programs. It has two objectives:
- - to improve the competitiveness of [renewable energy](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy) technologies; and
- - to increase the supply of renewable energy in Australia.
|
|
representatives vote 2014-09-01#13
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:17:01
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2014-08-28.16.1 motion] introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?house=representatives&mpc=Port_Adelaide&mpn=Mark_Butler Mark Butler], which means that it was rejected.
The motion criticised the government's plan to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA). However, it did not go so far as to decline to give the bill a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second reading]".[1] - The motion criticised the government's plan to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA). However, it did not go so far as to decline to give the bill a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second reading]".(When the House gives a bill a second reading, it means that the majority of the House agrees with the main idea of the bill.
)
- ''Background to the bill''
The bill was introduced to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA),[2] which is an independent agency that was established in 2012 to manage the government's renewable energy programs. It has two objectives:- The bill was introduced to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA),(Read more about ARENA on the organisation's [http://arena.gov.au/about-arena/ website].) which is an independent agency that was established in 2012 to manage the government's renewable energy programs. It has two objectives:
- * to improve the competitiveness of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy renewable energy] technologies; and
- * to increase the supply of renewable energy in Australia.
''References''* [1] When the House gives a bill a second reading, it means that the majority of the House agrees with the main idea of the bill.* [2] Read more about ARENA on the organisation's [http://arena.gov.au/about-arena/ website].
|
|
representatives vote 2014-09-01#13
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-09-03 15:00:08
|
Title
Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014 — Second Reading — Australian Renewable Energy Agency- Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014 — Second Reading — Criticise abolition of ARENA
Description
|
|
representatives vote 2014-09-01#13
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-09-03 14:57:05
|
Title
Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Australian Renewable Energy Agency- Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014 — Second Reading — Australian Renewable Energy Agency
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2014-08-28.16.1 motion] introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?house=representatives&mpc=Port_Adelaide&mpn=Mark_Butler Mark Butler], which means that it was rejected.
The motion criticised the government's plan to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA). However, it did not go so far as to give the bill a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second reading]",[1] - The motion criticised the government's plan to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA). However, it did not go so far as to decline to give the bill a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second reading]".[1]
- ''Background to the bill''
- The bill was introduced to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA),[2] which is an independent agency that was established in 2012 to manage the government's renewable energy programs. It has two objectives:
- * to improve the competitiveness of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy renewable energy] technologies; and
- * to increase the supply of renewable energy in Australia.
- ''References''
- * [1] When the House gives a bill a second reading, it means that the majority of the House agrees with the main idea of the bill.
- * [2] Read more about ARENA on the organisation's [http://arena.gov.au/about-arena/ website].
|
|
representatives vote 2014-09-01#13
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-09-03 14:55:51
|
Title
Bills — Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014; Second Reading- Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Australian Renewable Energy Agency
Description
<p class="speaker">Rob Mitchell</p><p>In accordance with standing order 133(b), I shall now proceed to put the question on the motion moved earlier today by the honourable member for Port Adelaide on which a division was called for and deferred in accordance with standing orders. No further debate is allowed.</p><p></p>- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2014-08-28.16.1 motion] introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?house=representatives&mpc=Port_Adelaide&mpn=Mark_Butler Mark Butler], which means that it was rejected.
- The motion criticised the government's plan to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA). However, it did not go so far as to give the bill a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second reading]",[1]
- ''Background to the bill''
- The bill was introduced to abolish the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Renewable_Energy_Agency Australian Renewable Energy Agency] (ARENA),[2] which is an independent agency that was established in 2012 to manage the government's renewable energy programs. It has two objectives:
- * to improve the competitiveness of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy renewable energy] technologies; and
- * to increase the supply of renewable energy in Australia.
- ''References''
- * [1] When the House gives a bill a second reading, it means that the majority of the House agrees with the main idea of the bill.
- * [2] Read more about ARENA on the organisation's [http://arena.gov.au/about-arena/ website].
<p>The question is that this bill be now read a second time.</p><p>Bill read a second time.</p>
|