|
representatives vote 2014-03-06#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-10-09 15:23:29
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2014-03-06.24.1) that the question be put, which was introduced by Liberal MP [Christopher Pyne](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives).The question was that the bill be agreed to and was subsequently put.(See that division [here](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2014-03-06&number=5&house=representatives). )_Background to the bill_The [Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5187) was introduced to remove the foreign ownership and other restrictions that apply to [Qantas](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas) but do not apply to other airlines based in Australia.(Read more on [ABC News](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-04/qantas-foreign-ownership-changes-explained/5296914) and on ABC Radio's [AM program](http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2014/s3956107.htm). ) These restrictions include: limits on the issue and ownership of Qantas shares, the makeup of the board of directors, use of the name Qantas and the location of the head office, place of incorporation and principle place of business.(Read more in the [bills digest](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/3071998/upload_binary/3071998.pdf;fileType=application/pdf) (852 KB).)References- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2014-03-06.24.1) that the question be put, which was introduced by Liberal MP [Christopher Pyne](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives).
- The question was that the bill be agreed to and was subsequently put.(See that division [here](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2014-03-06&number=5&house=representatives). )
- _Background to the bill_
- The [Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5187) was introduced to remove the foreign ownership and other restrictions that apply to [Qantas](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas) but do not apply to other airlines based in Australia.(Read more on [ABC News](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-04/qantas-foreign-ownership-changes-explained/5296914) and on ABC Radio's [AM program](http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2014/s3956107.htm). ) These restrictions include: limits on the issue and ownership of Qantas shares, the makeup of the board of directors, use of the name Qantas and the location of the head office, place of incorporation and principle place of business.(Read more in the [bills digest](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/3071998/upload_binary/3071998.pdf;fileType=application/pdf) (852 KB).)
|
|
representatives vote 2014-03-06#4
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:21:37
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2014-03-06.24.1 motion] that the question be put, which was introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne].The question was that the bill be agreed to and was subsequently put.(See that division [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2014-03-06&number=5&house=representatives here].
)''Background to the bill''The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5187 Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014] was introduced to remove the foreign ownership and other restrictions that apply to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas Qantas] but do not apply to other airlines based in Australia.(Read more on [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-04/qantas-foreign-ownership-changes-explained/5296914 ABC News] and on ABC Radio's [http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2014/s3956107.htm AM program].
) These restrictions include: limits on the issue and ownership of Qantas shares, the makeup of the board of directors, use of the name Qantas and the location of the head office, place of incorporation and principle place of business.(Read more in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/3071998/upload_binary/3071998.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (852 KB).)References- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2014-03-06.24.1) that the question be put, which was introduced by Liberal MP [Christopher Pyne](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives).
- The question was that the bill be agreed to and was subsequently put.(See that division [here](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2014-03-06&number=5&house=representatives). )
- _Background to the bill_
- The [Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5187) was introduced to remove the foreign ownership and other restrictions that apply to [Qantas](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas) but do not apply to other airlines based in Australia.(Read more on [ABC News](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-04/qantas-foreign-ownership-changes-explained/5296914) and on ABC Radio's [AM program](http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2014/s3956107.htm). ) These restrictions include: limits on the issue and ownership of Qantas shares, the makeup of the board of directors, use of the name Qantas and the location of the head office, place of incorporation and principle place of business.(Read more in the [bills digest](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/3071998/upload_binary/3071998.pdf;fileType=application/pdf) (852 KB).)
- References
|
|
representatives vote 2014-03-06#4
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:57
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2014-03-06.24.1 motion] that the question be put, which was introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne].
The question was that the bill be agreed to and was subsequently put.[1]- The question was that the bill be agreed to and was subsequently put.(See that division [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2014-03-06&number=5&house=representatives here].
)
- ''Background to the bill''
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5187 Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014] was introduced to remove the foreign ownership and other restrictions that apply to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas Qantas] but do not apply to other airlines based in Australia.[2] These restrictions include: limits on the issue and ownership of Qantas shares, the makeup of the board of directors, use of the name Qantas and the location of the head office, place of incorporation and principle place of business.[3]- The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5187 Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014] was introduced to remove the foreign ownership and other restrictions that apply to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas Qantas] but do not apply to other airlines based in Australia.(Read more on [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-04/qantas-foreign-ownership-changes-explained/5296914 ABC News] and on ABC Radio's [http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2014/s3956107.htm AM program].
) These restrictions include: limits on the issue and ownership of Qantas shares, the makeup of the board of directors, use of the name Qantas and the location of the head office, place of incorporation and principle place of business.(Read more in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/3071998/upload_binary/3071998.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (852 KB).)
- References
* [1] See that division [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2014-03-06&number=5&house=representatives here].* [2] Read more on [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-04/qantas-foreign-ownership-changes-explained/5296914 ABC News] and on ABC Radio's [http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2014/s3956107.htm AM program].* [3] Read more in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/3071998/upload_binary/3071998.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (852 KB).
|
|
representatives vote 2014-03-06#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-03-27 18:40:59
|
Title
Bills — Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014; Consideration in Detail- Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Consideration in Detail - Put the question
Description
<p class="speaker">Anthony Albanese</p><p>If the minister could respond, the challenge if this bill is passed will be what occurs in terms of the breakup of Qantas. There is a very real distinction between the corporate structure of Qantas and the corporate structure of Virgin. Virgin's international arm is a new arm. Qantas has—</p> <p class="speaker">Christopher Pyne</p>- The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2014-03-06.24.1 motion] that the question be put, which was introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne].
- The question was that the bill be agreed to and was subsequently put.[1]
- ''Background to the bill''
- The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5187 Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014] was introduced to remove the foreign ownership and other restrictions that apply to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas Qantas] but do not apply to other airlines based in Australia.[2] These restrictions include: limits on the issue and ownership of Qantas shares, the makeup of the board of directors, use of the name Qantas and the location of the head office, place of incorporation and principle place of business.[3]
- References
- * [1] See that division [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2014-03-06&number=5&house=representatives here].
- * [2] Read more on [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-04/qantas-foreign-ownership-changes-explained/5296914 ABC News] and on ABC Radio's [http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2014/s3956107.htm AM program].
- * [3] Read more in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/3071998/upload_binary/3071998.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (852 KB).
<p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the question be now put.</p> <p class="speaker">Russell Broadbent</p><p>The motion is that the question be put. I put the question. Those in favour? Those to the left?</p><p>An honourable member: Can you state the question?</p><p>The question is that the motion be put.</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Albanese</p><p>Which question?</p> <p class="speaker">Russell Broadbent</p><p>That the bill be read a third time.</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Albanese</p><p>No. With respect, Mr Deputy Speaker, procedurally, you cannot move that something be put that hasn't even been moved.</p><p>Government members interjecting—</p><p>You are a hopeless Leader of House and you still don't know what—</p><p>A government member: You haven't got the call!</p><p>There is no motion for the third reading before the House. Leave was sought. It was not given because I thought it was appropriate to have a consideration in detail stage so the minister can respond—</p> <p class="speaker">Russell Broadbent</p><p>The question before the chair is that the bill be agreed to, and the motion is that the bill be agreed to. I put the motion.</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Albanese</p><p>No-one has yet moved the third reading. I was speaking in the consideration in detail stage—</p> <p class="speaker">Russell Broadbent</p><p>The member for Grayndler will take his seat.</p> <p class="speaker">Christopher Pyne</p><p>Mr Deputy Speaker, on a point of order. The question was put to the House: was leave granted for the third reading to be moved forthwith? Leave was not granted for it to be moved forthwith, but we are now into the third reading of the bill—or the consideration in detail, because leave was not granted for the third reading to be moved forthwith. But the question before the House is that the bill be agreed to, as you have stated. I have moved that that question be put.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Burke</p><p>Point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker: it is impossible for the House to deal with the question 'That the question be put' when there is no question before the House. It would be like if one of us jumped up during question time and moved that the question be put when there is no question before the House. They asked for leave to move directly to the third reading. Leave was not granted. We moved to consideration in detail. Had leave been granted, they would have moved straightaway that the bill be read a third time. That did not happen. Therefore, there is no question before the House and it is impossible to move that the question be put when there is no question before the House.</p> <p class="speaker">Russell Broadbent</p><p>The question is that the question be now put.</p>
|