|
representatives vote 2013-11-21#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-10-09 15:37:03
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3) _that the Speaker's ruling be dissented from_. The motion was introduced by Opposition Labor MP [Tony Burke](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Burke&mpc=Watson&house=representatives)._Background to the Motion_The [Speaker](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives)’s [ruling](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1) referred to in Burke MP’s motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.(Currently the carbon pricing mechanism, which is an emissions trading scheme, has a fixed price. For more information on the difference between a flexible price and a fixed price, see the Clean Energy Regulator's [website](https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Pricing-Mechanism/About-the-Mechanism/Pages/default.aspx). ) The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).(For more information about standing orders, see this [fact sheet](http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html).)The amendment was going to be introduced during the consideration in detail stage of debate about the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and ten related bills.References- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3) _that the Speaker's ruling be dissented from_. The motion was introduced by Opposition Labor MP [Tony Burke](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Burke&mpc=Watson&house=representatives).
- _Background to the Motion_
- The [Speaker](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives)’s [ruling](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1) referred to in Burke MP’s motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.(Currently the carbon pricing mechanism, which is an emissions trading scheme, has a fixed price. For more information on the difference between a flexible price and a fixed price, see the Clean Energy Regulator's [website](https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Pricing-Mechanism/About-the-Mechanism/Pages/default.aspx). ) The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).(For more information about standing orders, see this [fact sheet](http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html).)
- The amendment was going to be introduced during the consideration in detail stage of debate about the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and ten related bills.
|
|
representatives vote 2013-11-21#3
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:21:26
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3 motion] ''that the Speaker's ruling be dissented from''. The motion was introduced by Opposition Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Burke&mpc=Watson&house=representatives Tony Burke].''Background to the Motion''The [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives Speaker]’s [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1 ruling] referred to in Burke MP’s motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.(Currently the carbon pricing mechanism, which is an emissions trading scheme, has a fixed price. For more information on the difference between a flexible price and a fixed price, see the Clean Energy Regulator's [https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Pricing-Mechanism/About-the-Mechanism/Pages/default.aspx website].
) The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).(For more information about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html fact sheet].)The amendment was going to be introduced during the consideration in detail stage of debate about the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and ten related bills.References- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3) _that the Speaker's ruling be dissented from_. The motion was introduced by Opposition Labor MP [Tony Burke](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Burke&mpc=Watson&house=representatives).
- _Background to the Motion_
- The [Speaker](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives)’s [ruling](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1) referred to in Burke MP’s motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.(Currently the carbon pricing mechanism, which is an emissions trading scheme, has a fixed price. For more information on the difference between a flexible price and a fixed price, see the Clean Energy Regulator's [website](https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Pricing-Mechanism/About-the-Mechanism/Pages/default.aspx). ) The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).(For more information about standing orders, see this [fact sheet](http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html).)
- The amendment was going to be introduced during the consideration in detail stage of debate about the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and ten related bills.
- References
|
|
representatives vote 2013-11-21#3
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:56
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3 motion] ''that the Speaker's ruling be dissented from''. The motion was introduced by Opposition Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Burke&mpc=Watson&house=representatives Tony Burke].
- ''Background to the Motion''
The [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives Speaker]’s [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1 ruling] referred to in Burke MP’s motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.[1] The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).[2]- The [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives Speaker]’s [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1 ruling] referred to in Burke MP’s motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.(Currently the carbon pricing mechanism, which is an emissions trading scheme, has a fixed price. For more information on the difference between a flexible price and a fixed price, see the Clean Energy Regulator's [https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Pricing-Mechanism/About-the-Mechanism/Pages/default.aspx website].
) The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).(For more information about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html fact sheet].)
- The amendment was going to be introduced during the consideration in detail stage of debate about the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and ten related bills.
- References
* [1] Currently the carbon pricing mechanism, which is an emissions trading scheme, has a fixed price. For more information on the difference between a flexible price and a fixed price, see the Clean Energy Regulator's [https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Pricing-Mechanism/About-the-Mechanism/Pages/default.aspx website].* [2] For more information about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html fact sheet].
|
|
representatives vote 2013-11-21#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-01-02 14:11:47
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3 motion] ''that the Speaker's ruling be dissented from''. The motion was introduced by Opposition Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Burke&mpc=Watson&house=representatives Tony Burke].
- ''Background to the Motion''
The [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives Speaker]’s [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1 ruling] referred to in Burke MP’s original motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.[1] The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).[2]- The [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives Speaker]’s [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1 ruling] referred to in Burke MP’s motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.[1] The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).[2]
- The amendment was going to be introduced during the consideration in detail stage of debate about the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and ten related bills.
- References
- * [1] Currently the carbon pricing mechanism, which is an emissions trading scheme, has a fixed price. For more information on the difference between a flexible price and a fixed price, see the Clean Energy Regulator's [https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Pricing-Mechanism/About-the-Mechanism/Pages/default.aspx website].
- * [2] For more information about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html fact sheet].
|
|
representatives vote 2013-11-21#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-01-02 14:09:57
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3 motion] ''that the Speaker's ruling be dissented from''. The motion was introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne], Leader of the House.The question referred to is contained in a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3 motion] put by Opposition Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Burke&mpc=Watson&house=representatives Tony Burke].- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3 motion] ''that the Speaker's ruling be dissented from''. The motion was introduced by Opposition Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Burke&mpc=Watson&house=representatives Tony Burke].
- ''Background to the Motion''
- The [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives Speaker]’s [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1 ruling] referred to in Burke MP’s original motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.[1] The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).[2]
- The amendment was going to be introduced during the consideration in detail stage of debate about the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and ten related bills.
- References
- * [1] Currently the carbon pricing mechanism, which is an emissions trading scheme, has a fixed price. For more information on the difference between a flexible price and a fixed price, see the Clean Energy Regulator's [https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Pricing-Mechanism/About-the-Mechanism/Pages/default.aspx website].
- * [2] For more information about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html fact sheet].
-
|
|
representatives vote 2013-11-21#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-01-02 14:08:54
|
Title
Motions — Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013; Dissent from Ruling- Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 - Motion to Dissent from Ruling
Description
<p class="speaker">Bronwyn Bishop</p><p>The question now before the chair is the motion, moved by the member for Watson, of dissent from the Speaker's ruling.</p> - The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3 motion] ''that the Speaker's ruling be dissented from''. The motion was introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne], Leader of the House.
- The question referred to is contained in a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.39.3 motion] put by Opposition Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Burke&mpc=Watson&house=representatives Tony Burke].
- ''Background to the Motion''
- The [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bronwyn_Bishop&mpc=Mackellar&house=representatives Speaker]’s [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-11-21.34.1 ruling] referred to in Burke MP’s original motion was to prevent the Opposition from introducing amendments that related to bringing forward the date of the commencement of the flexible price stage of the carbon pricing mechanism.[1] The Speaker’s ruling was made because the amendment may possibly result in liability under the scheme exceeding what is provided under the current law, which would therefore be contrary to standing orders 179(a) and 179(b).[2]
- The amendment was going to be introduced during the consideration in detail stage of debate about the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and ten related bills.
- References
- * [1] Currently the carbon pricing mechanism, which is an emissions trading scheme, has a fixed price. For more information on the difference between a flexible price and a fixed price, see the Clean Energy Regulator's [https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Pricing-Mechanism/About-the-Mechanism/Pages/default.aspx website].
- * [2] For more information about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html fact sheet].
-
|