All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2013-06-27#3
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:19:39
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a motion that the question should be put. The question referred to was whether to agree to the bill as amended and was subsequently put.(That division is available [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2013-06-27&number=4&house=representatives here].
)''Background to the Bill''The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5068 Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013] was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Brendan_O%26%2339%3BConnor&mpc=Gorton&house=representatives Brendan O'Connor] to “enhance the government's ability to deter sponsor behaviour which is inconsistent with the policy intent of the subclass 457 visa program and other temporary employer sponsored visa programs”.(Read MP O'Connor's comments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2013-06-06.3.2 here].
) At the time this bill was introduced, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/457_visa 457 visa program] was receiving extensive media attention with claims that it was being misused.(See [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-02/an-457-crackdown/4728148 ABC News]. A simple explanation of the 457 visa scheme can be found on the Department of Immigration and Border Protection’s website [http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/skilled-workers/sbs/ here].)References- The majority voted in favour of a motion that the question should be put. The question referred to was whether to agree to the bill as amended and was subsequently put.(That division is available [here](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2013-06-27&number=4&house=representatives). )
- _Background to the Bill_
- The [Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5068) was introduced by Labor MP [Brendan O'Connor](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Brendan_O%26%2339%3BConnor&mpc=Gorton&house=representatives) to “enhance the government's ability to deter sponsor behaviour which is inconsistent with the policy intent of the subclass 457 visa program and other temporary employer sponsored visa programs”.(Read MP O'Connor's comments [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2013-06-06.3.2). ) At the time this bill was introduced, the [457 visa program](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/457_visa) was receiving extensive media attention with claims that it was being misused.(See [ABC News](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-02/an-457-crackdown/4728148). A simple explanation of the 457 visa scheme can be found on the Department of Immigration and Border Protection’s website [here](http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/skilled-workers/sbs/).)
- References
|
|
representatives vote 2013-06-27#3
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:24
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a motion that the question should be put. The question referred to was whether to agree to the bill as amended and was subsequently put.[1]- The majority voted in favour of a motion that the question should be put. The question referred to was whether to agree to the bill as amended and was subsequently put.(That division is available [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2013-06-27&number=4&house=representatives here].
)
- ''Background to the Bill''
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5068 Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013] was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Brendan_O%26%2339%3BConnor&mpc=Gorton&house=representatives Brendan O'Connor] to “enhance the government's ability to deter sponsor behaviour which is inconsistent with the policy intent of the subclass 457 visa program and other temporary employer sponsored visa programs”.[2] At the time this bill was introduced, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/457_visa 457 visa program] was receiving extensive media attention with claims that it was being misused.[3]- The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5068 Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013] was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Brendan_O%26%2339%3BConnor&mpc=Gorton&house=representatives Brendan O'Connor] to “enhance the government's ability to deter sponsor behaviour which is inconsistent with the policy intent of the subclass 457 visa program and other temporary employer sponsored visa programs”.(Read MP O'Connor's comments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2013-06-06.3.2 here].
) At the time this bill was introduced, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/457_visa 457 visa program] was receiving extensive media attention with claims that it was being misused.(See [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-02/an-457-crackdown/4728148 ABC News]. A simple explanation of the 457 visa scheme can be found on the Department of Immigration and Border Protection’s website [http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/skilled-workers/sbs/ here].)
- References
* [1] That division is available [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2013-06-27&number=4&house=representatives here].* [2] Read MP O'Connor's comments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2013-06-06.3.2 here].* [3] See [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-02/an-457-crackdown/4728148 ABC News]. A simple explanation of the 457 visa scheme can be found on the Department of Immigration and Border Protection’s website [http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/skilled-workers/sbs/ here].
|
|
representatives vote 2013-06-27#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-02-24 15:56:06
|
Title
Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013 - Consideration in Detail -- Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013 - Consideration in Detail - Put the question
Description
- The majority voted in favour of a motion that the question should be put. The question referred to was whether to agree to the bill as amended and was subsequently put.[1]
- ''Background to the Bill''
- The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5068 Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013] was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Brendan_O%26%2339%3BConnor&mpc=Gorton&house=representatives Brendan O'Connor] to “enhance the government's ability to deter sponsor behaviour which is inconsistent with the policy intent of the subclass 457 visa program and other temporary employer sponsored visa programs”.[2] At the time this bill was introduced, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/457_visa 457 visa program] was receiving extensive media attention with claims that it was being misused.[3]
- References
- * [1] That division is available [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2013-06-27&number=4&house=representatives here].
- * [2] Read MP O'Connor's comments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2013-06-06.3.2 here].
- * [3] See [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-02/an-457-crackdown/4728148 ABC News]. A simple explanation of the 457 visa scheme can be found on the Department of Immigration and Border Protection’s website [http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/skilled-workers/sbs/ here].
|
|
representatives vote 2013-06-27#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-02-24 15:55:21
|
Title
Bills — Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013; Consideration in Detail- Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013 - Consideration in Detail -
Description
<p class="speaker">Scott Morrison</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That so much of standing and sessional orders be suspended as to allow the member for Lyne to address the House to provide valedictory remarks about his service to this House.</p>- The majority voted in favour of a motion that the question should be put. The question referred to was whether to agree to the bill as amended and was subsequently put.[1]
- ''Background to the Bill''
- The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5068 Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Visas) Bill 2013] was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Brendan_O%26%2339%3BConnor&mpc=Gorton&house=representatives Brendan O'Connor] to “enhance the government's ability to deter sponsor behaviour which is inconsistent with the policy intent of the subclass 457 visa program and other temporary employer sponsored visa programs”.[2] At the time this bill was introduced, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/457_visa 457 visa program] was receiving extensive media attention with claims that it was being misused.[3]
- References
- * [1] That division is available [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2013-06-27&number=4&house=representatives here].
- * [2] Read MP O'Connor's comments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2013-06-06.3.2 here].
- * [3] See [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-02/an-457-crackdown/4728148 ABC News]. A simple explanation of the 457 visa scheme can be found on the Department of Immigration and Border Protection’s website [http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/skilled-workers/sbs/ here].
<p class="speaker">Anna Burke</p><p>I am loath to put the member for Lyne in this situation. If you want the honest truth, and I understand the intention of the member for Cook, I am loath to use a member's valedictory in this way. But you have put the motion.</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Albanese</p><p>I move the original question. I move:</p><p class="italic">That the question be put.</p> <p class="speaker">Anna Burke</p><p>I had understood that the member for Cook might have been seeking another option and that is why I gave him the call. I had thought he had intended to move quickly to the member for Lyne, but I have misread that. The member for Cook has the call.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Morrison</p><p>This motion is put forward reluctantly because, as the Prime Minister said—</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Albanese</p><p>Speaker—</p><p class="italic">Mr Dutton interjecting—</p> <p class="speaker">Anna Burke</p><p>The member for Dickson will not continue with that line. The Deputy Prime Minister has the call.</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Albanese</p><p>My point of order is this, Speaker: the next business had been called on by you. There was an item already before the chair, and I moved that that question be put.</p> <p class="speaker">Anna Burke</p><p>The clerk had called on the item of business. I had given the member for Cook the call as I thought he was going to propose something else. I did not think he would then eat into 10 minutes time. I am going to put the question. The question is that the question be put.</p><p>Honourable members interjecting—</p><p>The suspension motion should relate to the motion before the chair. It does not. The member for Menzies on a point of order.</p> <p class="speaker">Kevin Andrews</p><p>Speaker, you have accepted a motion from the member for Cook.</p> <p class="speaker">Anna Burke</p><p>I have not!</p> <p class="speaker">Kevin Andrews</p><p>You have accepted that motion; he started to speak to it. Everybody in this place knows he has started to speak to it, Speaker.</p> <p class="speaker">Anna Burke</p><p>The member for Menzies will resume his seat. I gave the member for Cook the call as I thought he would be doing another—</p> <p class="speaker">Bronwyn Bishop</p><p>Does it matter?</p> <p class="speaker">Anna Burke</p><p>Yes, it does actually, member for Mackellar. The suspension must relate to the matter before the chair. As it does not, I am calling on the business of the day. The question is that the question be put.</p><p>The question now is that this bill, as amended, be agreed to.</p>
|