All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2012-08-16#3
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:21:03
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a motion introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Warren_Entsch&mpc=Leichhardt&house=representatives Warren Entsch],(Read Mr Entsch's explanation of his motion and the associated debate [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2012-06-25.229.1 here].
) which means it was rejected. This motion was:''That this House:''''(1) notes the profound financial impact on graziers and associated businesses by the Government's decision to ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_export live cattle exports] to Indonesia on 7 June 2011;''(Learn more about the ban on live animal exports to Indonesia on [http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3239274.htm Lateline].
)''(2) acknowledges that due to Government maladministration:''''(a) the criteria outline in the Business Assistance Payments program offered to affected graziers and businesses contained ambiguous wording and was confusing for applicants;''(Read more about this assistance program [http://www.daff.gov.au/about/media-centre/dept-releases/2011/live-export-assistance here].)''(b) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrelink Centrelink] staff who advised on applications for the Business Assistance Payments program offered inaccurate advice to eligible applicants; and''''(c) applicants who met the criteria missed the deadline for the program because they were misinformed about their eligibility; and''''(3) condemns the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_for_Agriculture_%28Australia%29 Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry] for:''''(a) refusing to extend the Business Assistance Payments program to assist affected farmers and businesses who experienced financial losses as a direct result of the live export ban; and''''(b) his poor handling of the issue, which has led to financial losses in the cattle industry.''References- The majority voted against a motion introduced by Liberal MP [Warren Entsch](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Warren_Entsch&mpc=Leichhardt&house=representatives),(Read Mr Entsch's explanation of his motion and the associated debate [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2012-06-25.229.1). ) which means it was rejected. This motion was:
- _That this House:_
- _(1) notes the profound financial impact on graziers and associated businesses by the Government's decision to ban [live cattle exports](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_export) to Indonesia on 7 June 2011;_(Learn more about the ban on live animal exports to Indonesia on [Lateline](http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3239274.htm). )
- _(2) acknowledges that due to Government maladministration:_
- _(a) the criteria outline in the Business Assistance Payments program offered to affected graziers and businesses contained ambiguous wording and was confusing for applicants;_(Read more about this assistance program [here](http://www.daff.gov.au/about/media-centre/dept-releases/2011/live-export-assistance).)
- _(b) [Centrelink](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrelink) staff who advised on applications for the Business Assistance Payments program offered inaccurate advice to eligible applicants; and_
- _(c) applicants who met the criteria missed the deadline for the program because they were misinformed about their eligibility; and_
- _(3) condemns the [Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_for_Agriculture_%28Australia%29) for:_
- _(a) refusing to extend the Business Assistance Payments program to assist affected farmers and businesses who experienced financial losses as a direct result of the live export ban; and_
- _(b) his poor handling of the issue, which has led to financial losses in the cattle industry._
- References
|
|
representatives vote 2012-08-16#3
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:52
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a motion introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Warren_Entsch&mpc=Leichhardt&house=representatives Warren Entsch],[1] which means it was rejected. This motion was:- The majority voted against a motion introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Warren_Entsch&mpc=Leichhardt&house=representatives Warren Entsch],(Read Mr Entsch's explanation of his motion and the associated debate [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2012-06-25.229.1 here].
) which means it was rejected. This motion was:
- ''That this House:''
''(1) notes the profound financial impact on graziers and associated businesses by the Government's decision to ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_export live cattle exports] to Indonesia on 7 June 2011;''[2]- ''(1) notes the profound financial impact on graziers and associated businesses by the Government's decision to ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_export live cattle exports] to Indonesia on 7 June 2011;''(Learn more about the ban on live animal exports to Indonesia on [http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3239274.htm Lateline].
)
- ''(2) acknowledges that due to Government maladministration:''
''(a) the criteria outline in the Business Assistance Payments program offered to affected graziers and businesses contained ambiguous wording and was confusing for applicants;''[3]- ''(a) the criteria outline in the Business Assistance Payments program offered to affected graziers and businesses contained ambiguous wording and was confusing for applicants;''(Read more about this assistance program [http://www.daff.gov.au/about/media-centre/dept-releases/2011/live-export-assistance here].)
- ''(b) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrelink Centrelink] staff who advised on applications for the Business Assistance Payments program offered inaccurate advice to eligible applicants; and''
- ''(c) applicants who met the criteria missed the deadline for the program because they were misinformed about their eligibility; and''
- ''(3) condemns the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_for_Agriculture_%28Australia%29 Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry] for:''
- ''(a) refusing to extend the Business Assistance Payments program to assist affected farmers and businesses who experienced financial losses as a direct result of the live export ban; and''
- ''(b) his poor handling of the issue, which has led to financial losses in the cattle industry.''
- References
* [1] Read Mr Entsch's explanation of his motion and the associated debate [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2012-06-25.229.1 here].* [2] Learn more about the ban on live animal exports to Indonesia on [http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3239274.htm Lateline].* [3] Read more about this assistance program [http://www.daff.gov.au/about/media-centre/dept-releases/2011/live-export-assistance here].
|
|
representatives vote 2012-08-16#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-06-20 09:53:01
|
Title
Private Members' Business — Live Animal Exports- Private Members' Business - Live Animal Exports - Condemn Minister's decision
Description
<p class="motion-notice motion-notice-notext">No motion text available</p>- The majority voted against a motion introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Warren_Entsch&mpc=Leichhardt&house=representatives Warren Entsch],[1] which means it was rejected. This motion was:
- ''That this House:''
- ''(1) notes the profound financial impact on graziers and associated businesses by the Government's decision to ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_export live cattle exports] to Indonesia on 7 June 2011;''[2]
- ''(2) acknowledges that due to Government maladministration:''
- ''(a) the criteria outline in the Business Assistance Payments program offered to affected graziers and businesses contained ambiguous wording and was confusing for applicants;''[3]
- ''(b) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrelink Centrelink] staff who advised on applications for the Business Assistance Payments program offered inaccurate advice to eligible applicants; and''
- ''(c) applicants who met the criteria missed the deadline for the program because they were misinformed about their eligibility; and''
- ''(3) condemns the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_for_Agriculture_%28Australia%29 Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry] for:''
- ''(a) refusing to extend the Business Assistance Payments program to assist affected farmers and businesses who experienced financial losses as a direct result of the live export ban; and''
- ''(b) his poor handling of the issue, which has led to financial losses in the cattle industry.''
- References
- * [1] Read Mr Entsch's explanation of his motion and the associated debate [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2012-06-25.229.1 here].
- * [2] Learn more about the ban on live animal exports to Indonesia on [http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3239274.htm Lateline].
- * [3] Read more about this assistance program [http://www.daff.gov.au/about/media-centre/dept-releases/2011/live-export-assistance here].
|