|
representatives vote 2007-09-12#1
Edited by
Henare Degan
on
2014-10-10 15:36:51
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2007-09-12.5.2) "That the words proposed to be omitted (Mr [Stephen Smith](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Stephen_Smith&mpc=Perth&house=representatives)’s amendment) stand part of the question." In other words, the majority wanted the original motion to remain unchanged.The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through to become law [here](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). )Mr Smith's amendment to that motion was: "That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading the House: (1) welcomes the fact that the Higher Education Endowment Fund, like the Future Fund, is for investment in Australia’s long-term national interests;"_Background to the bill_- This division relates to the Policy _[For increasing funding to university education](/policies/25)_.
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2007-09-12.5.2) "That the words proposed to be omitted (Mr [Stephen Smith](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Stephen_Smith&mpc=Perth&house=representatives)’s amendment) stand part of the question." In other words, the majority wanted the original motion to remain unchanged.
- The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through to become law [here](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). )
- Mr Smith's amendment to that motion was: "That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading the House: (1) welcomes the fact that the Higher Education Endowment Fund, like the Future Fund, is for investment in Australia’s long-term national interests;"
- _Background to the bill_
- The Bill was introduced to establish the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF), from which earnings from investments will be used to make grants of financial assistance to eligible higher education institutions in relation to capital expenditure and/or research facilities.(Read more about the bill in its [bills digest](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf) (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870).)
|
|
representatives vote 2007-09-12#1
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:18:21
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2007-09-12.5.2 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted (Mr [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Stephen_Smith&mpc=Perth&house=representatives Stephen Smith]’s amendment) stand part of the question." In other words, the majority wanted the original motion to remain unchanged.The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through to become law [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].
)Mr Smith's amendment to that motion was: "That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading the House: (1) welcomes the fact that the Higher Education Endowment Fund, like the Future Fund, is for investment in Australia’s long-term national interests;"''Background to the bill''The Bill was introduced to establish the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF), from which earnings from investments will be used to make grants of financial assistance to eligible higher education institutions in relation to capital expenditure and/or research facilities.(Read more about the bill in its [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870 here].)- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2007-09-12.5.2) "That the words proposed to be omitted (Mr [Stephen Smith](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Stephen_Smith&mpc=Perth&house=representatives)’s amendment) stand part of the question." In other words, the majority wanted the original motion to remain unchanged.
- The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through to become law [here](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). )
- Mr Smith's amendment to that motion was: "That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading the House: (1) welcomes the fact that the Higher Education Endowment Fund, like the Future Fund, is for investment in Australia’s long-term national interests;"
- _Background to the bill_
- The Bill was introduced to establish the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF), from which earnings from investments will be used to make grants of financial assistance to eligible higher education institutions in relation to capital expenditure and/or research facilities.(Read more about the bill in its [bills digest](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf) (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870).)
|
|
representatives vote 2007-09-12#1
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:09
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2007-09-12.5.2 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted (Mr [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Stephen_Smith&mpc=Perth&house=representatives Stephen Smith]’s amendment) stand part of the question." In other words, the majority wanted the original motion to remain unchanged.
The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."[1]- The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through to become law [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].
)
- Mr Smith's amendment to that motion was: "That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading the House: (1) welcomes the fact that the Higher Education Endowment Fund, like the Future Fund, is for investment in Australia’s long-term national interests;"
- ''Background to the bill''
The Bill was introduced to establish the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF), from which earnings from investments will be used to make grants of financial assistance to eligible higher education institutions in relation to capital expenditure and/or research facilities.[2]''References''* [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through to become law [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].* [2] Read more about the bill in its [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870 here].- The Bill was introduced to establish the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF), from which earnings from investments will be used to make grants of financial assistance to eligible higher education institutions in relation to capital expenditure and/or research facilities.(Read more about the bill in its [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870 here].)
|
|
representatives vote 2007-09-12#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-05-29 10:12:50
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2007-09-12.5.2 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted (Mr [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Stephen_Smith&mpc=Perth&house=representatives Stephen Smith]’s amendment) stand part of the question." In other words, the majority wanted the original motion to remain unchanged.
The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."- The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."[1]
- Mr Smith's amendment to that motion was: "That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading the House: (1) welcomes the fact that the Higher Education Endowment Fund, like the Future Fund, is for investment in Australia’s long-term national interests;"
- ''Background to the bill''
The Bill was introduced to establish the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF), from which earnings from investments will be used to make grants of financial assistance to eligible higher education institutions in relation to capital expenditure and/or research facilities.[1]- The Bill was introduced to establish the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF), from which earnings from investments will be used to make grants of financial assistance to eligible higher education institutions in relation to capital expenditure and/or research facilities.[2]
- ''References''
* [1] Read more about the bill in its [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870 here].- * [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through to become law [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].
- * [2] Read more about the bill in its [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870 here].
|
|
representatives vote 2007-09-12#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-05-29 10:11:27
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a motion "That the words proposed to be omitted (Mr Stephen Smith’s amendment) stand part of the question." In other words, the majority wanted the original motion to remain unchanged.- The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2007-09-12.5.2 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted (Mr [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Stephen_Smith&mpc=Perth&house=representatives Stephen Smith]’s amendment) stand part of the question." In other words, the majority wanted the original motion to remain unchanged.
- The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."
- Mr Smith's amendment to that motion was: "That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading the House: (1) welcomes the fact that the Higher Education Endowment Fund, like the Future Fund, is for investment in Australia’s long-term national interests;"
- ''Background to the bill''
- The Bill was introduced to establish the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF), from which earnings from investments will be used to make grants of financial assistance to eligible higher education institutions in relation to capital expenditure and/or research facilities.[1]
- ''References''
* [1] Read more about the bill in its [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870 here].- * [1] Read more about the bill in its [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870 here].
|
|
representatives vote 2007-09-12#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-05-29 10:07:09
|
Title
Higher Education Endowment Fund Bill 2007; Higher Education Endowment Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2007 — Second Reading- Higher Education Endowment Fund Bill 2007 - Second Reading - Keep the motion to read a bill for a second time unchanged
Description
<p pwmotiontext="moved">That this bill be now read a second time.</p><p pwmotiontext="moved">That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading the House:<dl><dt>(1)</dt><dd>welcomes the fact that the Higher Education Endowment Fund, like the Future Fund, is for investment in Australia’s long-term national interests;</dd></dl></p><p pwmotiontext="moved">That the words proposed to be omitted (<b>Mr Stephen Smith’s</b> amendment) stand part of the question.</p>- The majority voted in favour of a motion "That the words proposed to be omitted (Mr Stephen Smith’s amendment) stand part of the question." In other words, the majority wanted the original motion to remain unchanged.
- The original motion was "That this bill be now read a second time."
- Mr Smith's amendment to that motion was: "That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading the House: (1) welcomes the fact that the Higher Education Endowment Fund, like the Future Fund, is for investment in Australia’s long-term national interests;"
- ''Background to the bill''
- The Bill was introduced to establish the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF), from which earnings from investments will be used to make grants of financial assistance to eligible higher education institutions in relation to capital expenditure and/or research facilities.[1]
- ''References''
- * [1] Read more about the bill in its [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/TX6O6/upload_binary/tx6o64.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (164 KB). Its explanatory memorandum is available [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2870 here].
|