Division Description Changes — Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2006 — Second Reading — 20th Jun 2006

All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change	Division
representatives vote 2006-06-20#6 Edited by system on 2014-10-07 16:20:59	Title Description The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese] introduced a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1 motion] to omit and replace the words following "That". Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. ) ~~''Background to the bill''~~ ~~The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512 bill] was introduced to:~~ * enhance market transparency and business certainty; * increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies; * encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and * make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].(Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).) ~~References~~ The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16) "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [Anthony Albanese](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives) introduced a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1) to omit and replace the words following "That". Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [original motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4) that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [here](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). ) _Background to the bill_ The [bill](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512) was introduced to: - enhance market transparency and business certainty; - increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies; - encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and - make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target).(Read more about the bill in the [bills digest](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf) (200 KB).) References
representatives vote 2006-06-20#6 Edited by system on 2014-10-07 16:16:52	Title Description The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese] introduced a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1 motion] to omit and replace the words following "That". Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".[1] Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. ) ''Background to the bill'' The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512 bill] was introduced to: * enhance market transparency and business certainty; * increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies; * encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and * make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].[2] * make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].(Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).) References * [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. * [2] Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).
representatives vote 2006-06-20#6 Edited by mackay staff on 2014-04-16 18:00:28	Title Description The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese] introduced a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1 motion] to omit and replace the words following "That". Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form, which was "that this bill be now read a second time".[1] Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".[1] ''Background to the bill'' The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512 bill] was introduced to: * enhance market transparency and business certainty; * increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies; * encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and * make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].[2] References * [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. * [2] Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).
representatives vote 2006-06-20#6 Edited by mackay staff on 2014-04-16 17:59:33	Title ~~Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2006 — Second Reading~~ Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Stand as part of the question Description <p pwmotiontext="moved">That the words proposed to be omitted (<b>Mr Albanese&#8217;s</b> amendment) stand part of the question.</p> The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese] introduced a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1 motion] to omit and replace the words following "That". Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form, which was "that this bill be now read a second time".[1] ''Background to the bill'' The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512 bill] was introduced to: * enhance market transparency and business certainty; * increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies; * encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and * make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].[2] References * [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. * [2] Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).

Change

Division

representatives vote 2006-06-20#6

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:20:59

Title

Description

The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese] introduced a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1 motion] to omit and replace the words following "That".
Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. )
~~''Background to the bill''~~
~~The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512 bill] was introduced to:~~
* enhance market transparency and business certainty;
* increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies;
* encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and
* make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].(Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).)
~~References~~
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16) "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [Anthony Albanese](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives) introduced a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1) to omit and replace the words following "That".
Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [original motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4) that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [here](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). )
_Background to the bill_
The [bill](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512) was introduced to:
- enhance market transparency and business certainty;
- increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies;
- encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and
- make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target).(Read more about the bill in the [bills digest](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf) (200 KB).)
References

representatives vote 2006-06-20#6

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:16:52

Title

Description

The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese] introduced a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1 motion] to omit and replace the words following "That".
Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".[1]
Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here]. )
''Background to the bill''
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512 bill] was introduced to:
* enhance market transparency and business certainty;
* increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies;
* encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and
* make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].[2]
* make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].(Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).)
References
* [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].
* [2] Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).

representatives vote 2006-06-20#6

Edited by mackay staff

on 2014-04-16 18:00:28

Title

Description

The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese] introduced a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1 motion] to omit and replace the words following "That".
Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form, which was "that this bill be now read a second time".[1]
Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form. The original motion was: "That this bill be now read a second time".[1]
''Background to the bill''
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512 bill] was introduced to:
* enhance market transparency and business certainty;
* increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies;
* encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and
* make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].[2]
References
* [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].
* [2] Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).

representatives vote 2006-06-20#6

Edited by mackay staff

on 2014-04-16 17:59:33

Title

~~Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2006 — Second Reading~~
Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Stand as part of the question

Description

<p pwmotiontext="moved">That the words proposed to be omitted (<b>Mr Albanese&#8217;s</b> amendment) stand part of the question.</p>
The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.79.16 motion] "That the words proposed to be omitted ... stand part of the question". This is a procedural motion that was put after Labor MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese] introduced a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.10.1 motion] to omit and replace the words following "That".
Because the majority voted 'aye' in favour of this procedural motion, the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2006-06-20.71.4 original motion] that Mr Albanese wanted to amend remains in its original form, which was "that this bill be now read a second time".[1]
''Background to the bill''
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2512 bill] was introduced to:
* enhance market transparency and business certainty;
* increase opportunities for bioenergy and solar technologies;
* encourage innovation through recognising emerging renewable electricity generation technologies; and
* make administrative amendments in relation to the operation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_renewable_energy_target Mandatory Renewable Energy Target scheme].[2]
References
* [1] Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html here].
* [2] Read more about the bill in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/XZ5J6/upload_binary/xz5j63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (200 KB).