7 relevant divisions

Voted almost always for increasing scrutiny of unions

Something not right?

We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on increasing scrutiny of unions

Something not right?

Relevant divisions

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of unions”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.

Division Supporters vote

19th Oct 2016, 11:13 AM – Representatives Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

Yes

17th Aug 2015, 9:44 PM – Senate Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2014 [No. 2] - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea

Yes

2nd Mar 2015, 6:01 PM – Senate Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree to bill's main idea

Yes

14th May 2014, 11:15 AM – Senate Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea

Yes

12th Dec 2013, 9:14 AM – Representatives Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of unions”.

Division Supporters vote

20th Aug 2012, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Health Services Union - Greater penalties for misconduct

Yes

18th Jun 2012, 4:23 PM – Senate Motions - Registered Organisations - Accountability & transparency

Yes

If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.