Compare how Sue Lines and Carol Brown voted on decreasing the private health insurance rebate
Sue Lines
President Senator for WA since July 2022
Carol Brown
Australian Labor Party Senator for Tasmania since August 2005
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease the private health insurance rebate that eligible taxpayers are entitled to
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the private health insurance rebate” which either Sue Lines or Carol Brown could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Lines and Carol Brown on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Sue Lines | Carol Brown | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
15th Mar 2012, 6:13 PM – Senate Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives Bill 2012 and related bills - Third Reading - Read a third time |
- | absent | Yes |
15th Mar 2012, 6:04 PM – Senate Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives Bill 2012 and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time |
- | absent | Yes |
9th Mar 2010, 5:51 PM – Senate Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives Bill 2009 [No. 2] - Second Reading - Read a second time |
- | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the private health insurance rebate” which either Sue Lines or Carol Brown could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".