Compare how Slade Brockman and Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted on imprisoning immigration detention workers who record or reveal information from their work

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for imprisoning immigration detention workers who record or reveal information from their work” which either Slade Brockman or Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Slade Brockman and Skye Kakoschke-Moore on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Slade Brockman Skye Kakoschke-Moore Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for imprisoning immigration detention workers who record or reveal information from their work” which either Slade Brockman or Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Slade Brockman Skye Kakoschke-Moore Supporters vote

16th Oct 2017, 11:11 AM – Senate Australian Border Force Amendment (Protected Information) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Unauthorised disclosure

No No No

16th Oct 2017, 10:53 AM – Senate Australian Border Force Amendment (Protected Information) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Section 42

No No No