We can't say anything concrete about how Rachel Siewert voted on time-based restrictions on alcohol sales and venue entry
How Rachel Siewert voted compared to someone who agrees that venues shouldn't be allowed to accept new customers and alcohol sales should be forbidden after specified times
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for time-based restrictions on alcohol sales and venue entry” which Rachel Siewert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rachel Siewert on this policy.
| Division | Rachel Siewert | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for time-based restrictions on alcohol sales and venue entry” which Rachel Siewert could have attended.
| Division | Rachel Siewert | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Feb 2016, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions — Alcohol-Fuelled Violence |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Rachel Siewert has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.