Compare how Rachel Siewert and Sarah Hanson-Young voted on increasing federal government support for childcare

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing federal government support for childcare” which either Rachel Siewert or Sarah Hanson-Young could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rachel Siewert and Sarah Hanson-Young on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Rachel Siewert Sarah Hanson-Young Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing federal government support for childcare” which either Rachel Siewert or Sarah Hanson-Young could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Rachel Siewert Sarah Hanson-Young Supporters vote

12th Feb 2019, 5:59 PM – Senate Motions - In Home Care Program - Emergency relief required

Yes Yes Yes

7th Sep 2017, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Child Care - Acknowledge work & increase pay

Yes Yes Yes

17th Mar 2009, 4:18 PM – Senate Motions - Child Care - Not-for-profit government-supported childcare

Yes Yes Yes

13th Sep 2006, 3:44 PM – Senate Motions - Child Care - Increase wages for workers

Yes - Yes