How Peter Georgiou voted compared to someone who agrees that the Constitution should be amended to include a requirement for an Indigenous Voice to federal parliament, such as that envisaged by the Uluru Statement from the Heart

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice in parliament” which Peter Georgiou could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Georgiou on this policy.

Division Peter Georgiou Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice in parliament” which Peter Georgiou could have attended.

Division Peter Georgiou Supporters vote

22nd Aug 2018, 4:48 PM – Senate Motions - Wave Hill Walk-Off - Acknowledge

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Georgiou was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.