We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Evans voted on Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency
How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that the AU Government must address the causes and consequences of climate change as a matter of urgency with explicit proactive policies and direct & indirect actions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency” which Chris Evans could have attended.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Feb 2013, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change and National Security - Address in Defence White Paper |
No | Yes |
13th Nov 2008, 9:41 AM – Senate Motions - White Paper on Global Population - Develop |
absent | Yes |
24th Jun 2008, 3:48 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Act on conference conclusions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Chris Evans has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.