We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Evans voted on the right to protest
How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect the right of its citizens to protest against its laws, policies and decisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the right to protest” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.
Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
8th Feb 2006, 12:08 PM – Senate Defence Legislation Amendment (Aid to Civilian Authorities) Bill 2005 [2006] — In Committee - Protest |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the right to protest” which Chris Evans could have attended.
Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Chris Evans was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.