Compare how Chris Evans and John Faulkner voted on local community consultation on infrastructure projects

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for local community consultation on infrastructure projects” which either Chris Evans or John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans and John Faulkner on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Chris Evans John Faulkner Supporters vote

23rd Jun 2014, 9:38 PM – Senate Infrastructure Australia Amendment Bill 2013 - in Committee - Local community consultation

- absent Yes

17th Sep 2007, 8:14 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Democratic Plebiscites) Bill 2007 - In Committee - Major infrastructure projects

absent absent Yes

17th Sep 2007, 7:49 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Democratic Plebiscites) Bill 2007 - In Committee - Nuclear sites

Yes Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for local community consultation on infrastructure projects” which either Chris Evans or John Faulkner could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Chris Evans John Faulkner Supporters vote
no votes listed