How Janet Rice voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for the vocational education sector, which includes TAFEs, apprenticeships and traineeships

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Janet Rice could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Janet Rice on this policy.

Division Janet Rice Supporters vote

17th Oct 2019, 11:49 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund Bill 2019 and another - in Committee - $1 billion to TAFE

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Janet Rice could have attended.

Division Janet Rice Supporters vote

24th Jun 2021, 12:29 PM – Senate Motions - Employment, Western Australia - Resources Industry skills shortage

Yes Yes

17th Oct 2019, 11:31 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2019 - in Committee - The Education Investment Fund

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Janet Rice has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.