We can't say anything concrete about how David Feeney voted on greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
How David Feeney voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should publicly release more information about the contents of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal and its position in the negotiations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Feeney on this policy.
| Division | David Feeney | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which David Feeney could have attended.
| Division | David Feeney | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions — Trans-Pacific Partnership |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Feeney was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.