Compare how Steve Martin and James Paterson voted on protecting citizens' privacy

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting citizens' privacy” which either Steve Martin or James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Martin and James Paterson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Steve Martin James Paterson Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting citizens' privacy” which either Steve Martin or James Paterson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Steve Martin James Paterson Supporters vote

23rd Feb 2021, 7:15 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Privacy concerns

- No Yes

12th Nov 2018, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - My Health Record - Extend opt-out period

absent absent Yes

20th Sep 2018, 12:27 PM – Senate Motions - Right to Privacy - Protect

No No Yes

15th Aug 2018, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Digital Encryption - Warrant and privacy

No No Yes

29th Nov 2017, 4:10 PM – Senate Documents - Department of Human Services - Order for the Production of Documents

- No Yes