Compare how Steve Martin and Duncan Spender voted on suspending the rules to allow a vote to happen (procedural)

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for suspending the rules to allow a vote to happen (procedural)” which either Steve Martin or Duncan Spender could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Martin and Duncan Spender on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Steve Martin Duncan Spender Supporters vote

2nd Apr 2019, 5:29 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Let a vote happen

No Yes Yes

14th Feb 2019, 12:44 PM – Senate Motions - Queensland Nickel - Suspend usual rules

absent - Yes

13th Feb 2019, 10:11 AM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Let another vote happen

No - Yes

6th Dec 2018, 4:29 PM – Senate Business - Rearrangement - Let another vote happen

absent - Yes

6th Dec 2018, 2:32 PM – Senate Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Let a vote happen

absent - Yes

4th Dec 2018, 5:05 PM – Senate Documents - Queensland: Abortion - Let a vote happen

absent - Yes

3rd Dec 2018, 1:46 PM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Suspend the usual rules

absent - Yes

26th Nov 2018, 4:23 PM – Senate Motions - Suspension of Standing Orders - Let a vote happen

absent - Yes

13th Nov 2018, 12:38 PM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Let another vote happen

absent - Yes

17th Oct 2018, 4:23 PM – Senate Motions - Suspension of Standing Orders - Let a vote happen

absent - Yes

15th Oct 2018, 3:22 PM – Senate Documents - Religious Freedom Review Expert Panel; Order for the Production of Documents - Let a vote happen

absent - Yes

15th Oct 2018, 11:11 AM – Senate Motions — Suspension of Standing Orders

absent - Yes

20th Aug 2018, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - Suspension of Standing Orders

absent - Yes

15th Aug 2018, 10:48 AM – Senate Motions - Anning, Senator Fraser; Censure - Let vote happen

No - Yes

25th Jun 2018, 4:53 PM – Senate Motions - Suspension of Standing Orders - Let Senator McKim introduce his motion

No - Yes

25th Jun 2018, 12:58 PM – Senate Business - Rearrangement - Let a vote happen

No - Yes

21st Jun 2018, 10:06 AM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Let another vote take place

No - Yes

20th Jun 2018, 4:37 PM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Suspend the procedural rules

No - Yes

20th Jun 2018, 3:40 PM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Let another motion be introduced

Yes - Yes

15th Feb 2018, 3:37 PM – Senate Motions - Deputy Prime Minister - Let a vote happen

absent - Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for suspending the rules to allow a vote to happen (procedural)” which either Steve Martin or Duncan Spender could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Steve Martin Duncan Spender Supporters vote
no votes listed