Compare how Paul Calvert and Simon Birmingham voted on uranium export

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for uranium export” which either Paul Calvert or Simon Birmingham could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Paul Calvert and Simon Birmingham on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Paul Calvert Simon Birmingham Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for uranium export” which either Paul Calvert or Simon Birmingham could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Paul Calvert Simon Birmingham Supporters vote

12th Feb 2015, 12:15 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Energy

- No No

13th Mar 2013, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports - Review all bilateral uranium supply arrangements

- absent No

22nd Mar 2012, 1:46 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Energy - India and other countries standing outside the NPT

- No No

23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports - For export of uranium to India

- Yes Yes

31st Oct 2011 – Senate Motions — Nuclear Nonproliferation - Identify countries that won't sell to

- No No

12th Nov 2008, 3:51 PM – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports — Take into account public opinion and the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties report

- absent No

15th Aug 2007, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Non—Proliferation - Do not sell to non-NPT parties

No No No

13th Aug 2007, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Nonproliferation - Block moves to exempt India from NSG rules

No No No

8th Aug 2007, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions — India and the Nuclear Non—Proliferation Treaty — Encourage to sign

absent No No

18th Jun 2007, 3:46 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - No export to Russia

absent No No

27th Feb 2007, 4:04 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Proliferation - Block US-India deal at NSG meeting and rule out supply of uranium to India

absent - No

27th Feb 2007, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Weapons — No exporting to non—NPT parties, support support non—proliferation

No - No

10th Oct 2006, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Nonproliferation — Against Australia becoming a nuclear fuel supply centre and against sale of uranium to India

absent - No

14th Sep 2006, 9:59 AM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Tests at Maralinga — For non—proliferation and against export to non—Treaty states

No - No

10th May 2006, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - Oppose export to China

absent - No

28th Mar 2006, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - No export to India

absent - No

28th Feb 2006, 3:46 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Non—Proliferation Treaty - Against uranium export to non-Treaty states

No - No