Compare how Paul Calvert and Natasha Stott Despoja voted on implementing refugee and protection conventions

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which either Paul Calvert or Natasha Stott Despoja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Paul Calvert and Natasha Stott Despoja on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Paul Calvert Natasha Stott Despoja Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which either Paul Calvert or Natasha Stott Despoja could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Paul Calvert Natasha Stott Despoja Supporters vote

26th Feb 2007, 5:03 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Asylum Seekers - Non-refoulment

No Yes Yes

20th Jun 2006, 4:05 PM – Senate Motions - World Refugee Day - Refugee Convention

No Yes Yes