We can't say anything concrete about how Eric Abetz voted on increasing government funding to private bodies that provide certain services
How Eric Abetz voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding to private bodies that provide certain services otherwise provided by the government, such as education and health (for example, private universities)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing government funding to private bodies that provide certain services” which Eric Abetz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Eric Abetz on this policy.
Division | Eric Abetz | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing government funding to private bodies that provide certain services” which Eric Abetz could have attended.
Division | Eric Abetz | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
18th Jun 2015, 12:30 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Extend funding to private universities and colleges |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Eric Abetz was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.