We can't say anything concrete about how Stirling Griff voted on supporting Israel
How Stirling Griff voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should support Israel internationally and use its voting power in bodies such as the United Nations to demonstrate this support
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for supporting Israel” which Stirling Griff could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stirling Griff on this policy.
Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for supporting Israel” which Stirling Griff could have attended.
Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
18th Oct 2017, 4:32 PM – Senate Motions - United Nations Human Rights Council - Re-focus |
absent | Yes |
18th Oct 2017, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - United Nations: Membership - UNESCO & anti-Israeli bias |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stirling Griff was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.