Compare how Stirling Griff and Nick Xenophon voted on requiring every native title claimant to sign land use agreements

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring every native title claimant to sign land use agreements” which either Stirling Griff or Nick Xenophon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stirling Griff and Nick Xenophon on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Stirling Griff Nick Xenophon Supporters vote

13th Jun 2017, 7:26 PM – Senate Native Title Amendment (Indigenous Land Use Agreements) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

Yes Yes No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring every native title claimant to sign land use agreements” which either Stirling Griff or Nick Xenophon could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Stirling Griff Nick Xenophon Supporters vote
no votes listed