Compare how Sarah Hanson-Young and Mitch Fifield voted on the territories being able to legalise euthanasia

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the territories being able to legalise euthanasia” which either Sarah Hanson-Young or Mitch Fifield could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sarah Hanson-Young and Mitch Fifield on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sarah Hanson-Young Mitch Fifield Supporters vote

24th Nov 2022, 9:26 AM – Senate Restoring Territory Rights Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

Yes - Yes

15th Aug 2018, 7:03 PM – Senate Restoring Territory Rights (Assisted Suicide Legislation) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

Yes No Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the territories being able to legalise euthanasia” which either Sarah Hanson-Young or Mitch Fifield could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sarah Hanson-Young Mitch Fifield Supporters vote
no votes listed