We can't say anything concrete about how Robert Hill voted on the right to protest
How Robert Hill voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect the right of its citizens to protest against its laws, policies and decisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the right to protest” which Robert Hill could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Robert Hill on this policy.
Division | Robert Hill | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
8th Feb 2006, 12:08 PM – Senate Defence Legislation Amendment (Aid to Civilian Authorities) Bill 2005 [2006] — In Committee - Protest |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the right to protest” which Robert Hill could have attended.
Division | Robert Hill | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Robert Hill was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.