We can't say anything concrete about how Marielle Smith voted on a constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice in parliament
How Marielle Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the Constitution should be amended to include a requirement for an Indigenous Voice to federal parliament, such as that envisaged by the Uluru Statement from the Heart
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice in parliament” which Marielle Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marielle Smith on this policy.
| Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice in parliament” which Marielle Smith could have attended.
| Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Sep 2019, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Message Sticks Carried by Alwyn Doolan - Accept |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Marielle Smith was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.