We can't say anything concrete about how David Fawcett voted on a nation-wide approach to border closures due to COVID-19
How David Fawcett voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage states and territories to stop acting independently and instead take a nation-wide approach to COVID-19 border closures through the National Cabinet
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a nation-wide approach to border closures due to COVID-19” which David Fawcett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Fawcett on this policy.
| Division | David Fawcett | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a nation-wide approach to border closures due to COVID-19” which David Fawcett could have attended.
| Division | David Fawcett | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Aug 2020, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Covid-19 - State and Territory Border Closures |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Fawcett was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.