Compare how David Fawcett and Patrick Dodson voted on reproductive bodily autonomy

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which either David Fawcett or Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Fawcett and Patrick Dodson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division David Fawcett Patrick Dodson Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which either David Fawcett or Patrick Dodson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division David Fawcett Patrick Dodson Supporters vote

16th Oct 2019 – Senate Motions - Abortion - Congratulate NSW

absent absent Yes

14th Feb 2018, 4:41 PM – Senate Motions - Abortion - Alternatives and counselling

Yes No No

7th Feb 2018, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Reproductive Health Services - Availability of abortion services

absent Yes Yes

16th Feb 2006, 12:54 PM – Representatives Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Second Reading - Read a second time

No - Yes