Compare how David Fawcett and Eric Abetz voted on maintaining or increasing defence spending
David Fawcett
Liberal Party Senator for SA since July 2011
Eric Abetz
Former Liberal Party Senator for Tasmania February 1994 – May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should keep up or increase the amount of money it spends on defence
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing defence spending” which either David Fawcett or Eric Abetz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Fawcett and Eric Abetz on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | David Fawcett | Eric Abetz | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing defence spending” which either David Fawcett or Eric Abetz could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | David Fawcett | Eric Abetz | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
9th May 2017, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - Fund diplomatic network and aid |
No | No | No |
22nd Mar 2017 – Senate Motions - Defence Expenditure - Redirect |
No | No | No |