Compare how David Fawcett and Penny Wong voted on storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies” which either David Fawcett or Penny Wong could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Fawcett and Penny Wong on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division David Fawcett Penny Wong Supporters vote

26th Mar 2015 – Senate Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2015 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

Yes Yes Yes

24th Mar 2015, 8:46 PM – Senate Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies” which either David Fawcett or Penny Wong could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division David Fawcett Penny Wong Supporters vote

16th Mar 2016 – Senate Motions - Mandatory Telecommunications Data Retention Scheme - Repeal the scheme

No absent No