Compare how Dana Wortley and Ruth Webber voted on increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which either Dana Wortley or Ruth Webber could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dana Wortley and Ruth Webber on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Dana Wortley Ruth Webber Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which either Dana Wortley or Ruth Webber could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Dana Wortley Ruth Webber Supporters vote

14th May 2009, 10:34 AM – Senate Motions - Remuneration Tribunal Determination - Electorate allowance

No - No

7th Sep 2006, 12:27 PM – Senate Motions - Motion for Disallowance - Parliamentary printing allowances

absent Yes No

5th Sep 2006, 6:25 PM – Senate Motions - Remuneration and Allowances - Pay rise

No No No