Compare how Dana Wortley and Anne McEwen voted on maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding” which either Dana Wortley or Anne McEwen could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dana Wortley and Anne McEwen on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Dana Wortley Anne McEwen Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding” which either Dana Wortley or Anne McEwen could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Dana Wortley Anne McEwen Supporters vote

1st Sep 2014, 3:39 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Animal Health Laboratory - Fund CSIRO

- Yes Yes

14th Feb 2008, 10:22 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reverse decision to cut funding

No No Yes

9th Feb 2006, 9:40 AM – Senate Motions - Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - Renewable energy

No No Yes