Compare how Dana Wortley and Alan Ferguson voted on increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which either Dana Wortley or Alan Ferguson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dana Wortley and Alan Ferguson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Dana Wortley Alan Ferguson Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which either Dana Wortley or Alan Ferguson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Dana Wortley Alan Ferguson Supporters vote

21st Jun 2011 – Senate Governance of Australian Government Superannuation Schemes Bill 2011 - In Committee - Quorum requirement

No Yes No

20th Jun 2011 – Senate Governance of Australian Government Superannuation Schemes Bill 2011 - In Committee - ACTU nomination of board members

No Yes No